Castro v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc.

Filing 71

Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss by Entrepreneur Media, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jennifer L. Barry (with exhibits), # 2 Proposed Order). Motions referred to Judge Andrew W. Austin. (Barry, Jennifer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION DANIEL R. CASTRO, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v. ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC., Defendant. ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC., Counterclaimant, v. DANIEL R. CASTRO, Counterdefendant. Cause No. 1-10-CV-000695-LY-AWA Hon. Lee Yeakel DECLARATION OF JENNIFER L. BARRY IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SHORT EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO FILE AND SERVE REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS I, Jennifer L. Barry, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Latham & Watkins LLP, counsel for Defendant and Counterclaimant Entrepreneur Media, Inc. (“EMI”) in the above-entitled case. As such, I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below, and if called upon to do so, could and would testify as follows. 2. EMI filed a Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint on July 19, 2011 (Docket #62). 3. Plaintiff filed five separate opposition briefs to the Motion to Dismiss on August 1, 2011. These briefs totaled over 60 pages, with multiple exhibits. 4. On August 8, 2011, at 12:04 p.m., I sent an email to Castro requesting a short extension of five days to the deadline (to August 17th) for EMI to file its reply brief in support of 1 SD\799862.1 the Motion to Dismiss. A true and correct copy of that email is attached as Exhibit A. 5. Later that day, at 1:37 p.m., Castro responded and refused to agree to the requested extension. A true and correct copy of Castro’s email is attached as Exhibit B. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. This declaration was signed on August 8, 2011. /s/ Jennifer L. Barry Jennifer L. Barry 2 SD\799862.1 Exhibit A From: Barry, Jennifer (SD) Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 12:04 PM To: 'Dan Castro' Subject: Deadline extension for reply brief Hi Dan, Our reply brief is currently due this Friday. Would you please agree to give us an additional five days to file this brief, so that our deadline is now Wednesday, 8/17? I will prepare the stip for your signature if that is OK. Thanks! Jennifer L. Barry | LATHAM & WATKINS LLP | 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800 San Diego, CA 92101 | DD: 619-238-3024 | F: 619-696-7419 | jennifer.barry@lw.com 3 SD\799862.1 Exhibit B From: Dan Castro [mailto:danmancastro@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 1:37 PM To: Barry, Jennifer (SD) Cc: Viscounty, Perry (OC); Dan Castro Subject: Re: Deadline extension for reply brief Jennifer, Under normal circumstances, I would of course be willing to grant you an extension. You are a hard worker and you deserve it. But unfortunately, your client has been operating in bad faith. Your client flew all the way to Austin and agreed to something in writing and then "changed his mind" about it when he got home. You and Perry have yet to explain to me why he suddenly is unwilling to stand by his original agreement. Why fly all the way to Austin and pay a high priced mediator to hammer out a perfectly good agreement if you were never going to sign the agreement anyway? Perry is the only person Mr. Shea listens to. That much is clear. So, I have to blame Perry for allowing Mr. Shea to "change his mind" about the domain name issue without providing me with any legal reasons for doing so. Perry is a smart attorney. He should know by now that you can't offer somebody something (and actually agree to it) and then take it back without offering something in its place. That's called Negotiation 101. I wish I could give you your extension, but for the above reasons, I must decline. If there were a family emergency, or a medical emergency, I would of course agree. Hope you understand. Dan On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:03 PM, <Jennifer.Barry@lw.com> wrote: Hi Dan, Our reply brief is currently due this Friday. Would you please agree to give us an additional five days to file this brief, so that our deadline is now Wednesday, 8/17? I will prepare the stip for your signature if that is OK. Thanks! 4 SD\799862.1 Jennifer L. Barry | LATHAM & WATKINS LLP | 600 West Broadway, Suite 1800 San Diego, CA 92101 | DD: 619-238-3024 | F: 619-696-7419 | jennifer.barry@lw.com **************************************************************** *************** To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax issues in this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by you, (i) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. For more information please go to http://www.lw.com/docs/irs.pdf **************************************************************** *************** This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. Latham & Watkins LLP -Castro & Baker, LLP 7800 Shoal Creek Blvd. Suite 100N Austin, Texas 78757 512-732-0111 - phone 512-732-0115 - fax 5 SD\799862.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?