SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 245

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Novell's Opposition to SCO's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Normand, Edward)

SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Doc. 245

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 245

Filed 03/09/2007

Page 1 of 3

Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard ­ Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.

Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America Tower ­ Suite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff /Counterclaim-Defendant, v. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. Case No. 2:04CV00139 Honorable Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO NOVELL'S OPPOSITION TO SCO'S CROSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NOVELL'S FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 245

Filed 03/09/2007

Page 2 of 3

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO"), through counsel, hereby moves the Court for an extension of time to reply to Novell's Opposition to SCO's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief filed by Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc. ("Novell"). SCO respectfully requests that it be granted an extension of time, to and including March 16, 2007, within which to file a response to Novell's opposition. Counsel for SCO has conferred with counsel for Novell regarding the requested extension. Novell's counsel does not oppose SCO's request for an extension of the deadline to March 16, 2007. DATED this 9th day of March, 2007. HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Robert Silver Stuart H. Singer Stephen N. Zack Edward Normand Counsel for The SCO Group, Inc. By __/s/ Edward Normand______________

2

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 245

Filed 03/09/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, The SCO Group, Inc., hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff, Novell, Inc., on this 9th day of March, 2007, via CM/ECF upon the following: Thomas R. Karrenberg John P. Mullen Heather M. Sneddon ANDERSON & KARRENBERG 700 Bank One Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Michael A. Jacobs Matthew I. Kreeger Kenneth W. Brakebill MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482

_______/s/ Edward Normand________

3