SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Novell's Opposition to SCO's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Normand, Edward)
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Page 1 of 3
Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 363-6363 Facsimile: (801) 363-6666 Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc.
Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America Tower Suite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 539-8400 Facsimile: (305) 539-1307
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff /Counterclaim-Defendant, v. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. Case No. 2:04CV00139 Honorable Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO NOVELL'S OPPOSITION TO SCO'S CROSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON NOVELL'S FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Page 2 of 3
Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant The SCO Group, Inc. ("SCO"), through counsel, hereby moves the Court for an extension of time to reply to Novell's Opposition to SCO's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief filed by Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc. ("Novell"). SCO respectfully requests that it be granted an extension of time, to and including March 16, 2007, within which to file a response to Novell's opposition. Counsel for SCO has conferred with counsel for Novell regarding the requested extension. Novell's counsel does not oppose SCO's request for an extension of the deadline to March 16, 2007. DATED this 9th day of March, 2007. HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Robert Silver Stuart H. Singer Stephen N. Zack Edward Normand Counsel for The SCO Group, Inc. By __/s/ Edward Normand______________
Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, The SCO Group, Inc., hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff, Novell, Inc., on this 9th day of March, 2007, via CM/ECF upon the following: Thomas R. Karrenberg John P. Mullen Heather M. Sneddon ANDERSON & KARRENBERG 700 Bank One Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Michael A. Jacobs Matthew I. Kreeger Kenneth W. Brakebill MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
_______/s/ Edward Normand________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?