SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Stipulated MOTION for Protective Order (Entry of Stipulated Addendum) filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Sneddon, Heather)
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
Page 1 of 2
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs (pro hac vice) Kenneth W. Brakebill (pro hac vice) 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ANDERSON & KARRENBERG Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726 John P. Mullen, #4097 Heather M. Sneddon, #9520 700 Chase Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801) 534-1700 Facsimile: (801) 364-7697 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:04CV00139 Judge Dale A. Kimball
Page 2 of 2
Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant The SCO Group, Inc. and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc., pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), hereby stipulate to and jointly move the Court for entry of the attached Stipulated Addendum to Protective Order in this matter, to provide for the production in this litigation of certain confidential financial information produced by IBM in SCO v. IBM, Case No. 03-0294 DAKBCW. Dated: March 26, 2007 HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C.
By: /s/ Brent O. Hatch Signed by filing attorney with permission from Brent O. Hatch Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc. 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, UT 84101
ANDERSON & KARRENBERG
By: /s/ Heather M. Sneddon Attorneys for Novell, Inc. 700 Chase Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?