SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 387

MOTION to Dismiss Voluntarily Its Third Claim for Relief filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sneddon, Heather)

Download PDF
Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW SCO Grp v. Novell Inc Document 387-2 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 2 D Doc. 387 Att. MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs, pro hac vice Eric M. Acker, pro hac vice Kenneth W. Brakebill, pro hac vice Marc J. Pernick, pro hac vice David E. Melaugh, pro hac vice 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ANDERSON & KARRENBERG Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726 John P. Mullen, #4097 Heather M. Sneddon, #9520 700 Chase Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801) 534-1700 Facsimile: (801) 364-7697 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant, v s. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NOVELL'S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ITS THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF Case No. 2:04CV00139 Honorable Dale A. Kimball ockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW Document 387-2 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 2 of 2 This ____ day of _____________, 2007, defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Novell, Inc. ("Novell") having filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss its Third Claim for Relief, Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Novell's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Its Third Claim for Relief is granted. Novell's Third Claim shall be dismissed, with Novell having the right to renew such claim only in the event there is any subsequent adjudication or trial in this action or any enlargement of the issues for trial beyond that contemplated by the August 17, 2007 Joint Statement. _________________________________ Honorable Dale A. Kimball United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?