SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 452

OBJECTIONS to 382 Witness List(Proposed) (Novell's Second Amended Rule 26 Pretrial Disclosures) filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Normand, Edward)

SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Doc. 452

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 452

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 1 of 3

Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, PC 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] David Boies (admitted pro hac vice) Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Devan V. Padmanabhan (admitted pro hac vice) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff, The SCO Group, Inc.

Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America Tower ­ Suite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Stuart Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

_______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff.

SCO'S OBJECTIONS TO NOVELL'S RULE 26 DISCLOSURE

Civil No.: 2:04CV00139 Judge Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Brooke C. Wells

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 452

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 2 of 3

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3), SCO responds to Novell's Rule 26 disclosures as follows: The attached Exhibit A contains SCO's objections to the admissibility of exhibits identified in Novell's Rule 26 disclosure. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3), Exhibit A does not include SCO's Federal Rule of Evidence 402 or 403 objections, which SCO expressly reserves. SCO also reserves the right to revisit these objections should there be any subsequent adjudication or trial in this action or any enlargement of the issues for trial beyond that contemplated by the August 17, 2007 Joint Statement. DATED this 5th day of September, 2007.

HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies Robert Silver Stuart H. Singer Stephen N. Zack Edward Normand DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Devan V. Padmanabhan

Counsel for The SCO Group, Inc. By: __/s/ Edward Normand_____________

Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW

Document 452

Filed 09/05/2007

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, The SCO Group, Inc., hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of SCO'S OBJECTIONS TO NOVELL'S RULE 26 DISCLOSURE was served on this 5th day of September, 2007, via CM/ECF to the following:

Thomas R. Karrenberg John P. Mullen Heather M. Sneddon ANDERSON & KARRENBERG 700 Bank One Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Michael A. Jacobs Matthew I. Kreeger Kenneth W. Brakebill David E. Melaugh MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482

/s/ Edward Normand