SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group, Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells.(Hatch, Brent)
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc
0 Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, PC 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 363-6363 Facsimile: (801) 363-6666 David Boies (admitted pro hac vice) Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 Devan V. Padmanabhan (admitted pro hac vice) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 50 south Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 340-2600 Facsimile: (612) 340-2868
Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America Tower, suite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 539-8400 Facsimile: (305) 539-1307 Stuart Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Blvd. Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Facsimile: (954) 356-0022
Attorneys for Plaintiff, The SCO Group, Inc. ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. Civil No. 2:04 CV-00139 Judge Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Brooke C. Wells SCO'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OVERLENGTH MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO NOVELL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITS FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant The SCO Group ("SCO") hereby moves the Court pursuant to District Court Rule 7-1(e) for an Order granting it leave to file its over-length Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief that consists of approximately 70 pages, exclusive of face sheet, tables of contents and authorities, appendixes and exhibits. SCO has endeavored to be as concise as possible, but respectfully submits that the excess length is necessary to fully and fairly address the issues being placed before the Court. SCO respectfully requests that it be allowed to file its Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief containing approximately 70 pages, exclusive of face sheet, tables of contents and authorities, appendixes and exhibits.
DATED this 25th day of January, 2008. HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies Robert Silver Stuart H. Singer Stephen N. Zack Edward Normand DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Devan V. Padmanabhan By: /s/ Brent O. Hatch____________ Counsel for The SCO Group, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, The SCO Group, Inc., hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff, Novell, Inc., on this 25th day of January, 2008, via CM/ECF to the following: Thomas R. Karrenberg John P. Mullen Heather M. Sneddon ANDERSON & KARRENBERG 700 Bank One Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Michael A. Jacobs Matthew I. Kreeger Kenneth W. Brakebill MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
/s/ Brent O. Hatch
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?