SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 661

OBJECTIONS to 625 Exhibit List(Proposed) Second Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Brennan, Sterling)

SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Doc. 661

WORKMAN | NYDEGGER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Sterling A. Brennan (Utah State Bar No. 10060; E-mail: [e-mail]) David R. Wright (Utah State Bar No. 5164: E-mail: [e-mail]) Kirk R. Harris (Utah State Bar No. 10221; E-mail: [e-mail]) Cara J. Baldwin (Utah State Bar No. 11863; E-mail: [e-mail]) 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 E. South Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs (Admitted Pro Hac Vice; E-mail: [e-mail]) Eric M. Acker (Admitted Pro Hac Vice; E-mail: [e-mail]) Grant L. Kim (Admitted Pro Hac Vice; E-Mail: [e-mail]) 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. Judge Ted Stewart Case No. 2:04CV00139 NOVELL'S OBJECTIONS TO SCO'S SECOND AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26(a)(3) PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES

sf-2801034

1

Dockets.Justia.com

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3), Novell responds to SCO's Second Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures (Dkt. 625) as follows: Novell re-asserts and incorporates herein by reference the objections to SCO's trial exhibits stated in Novell's August 31, 2007 Objections to SCO's Rule 26 Disclosure (Dkt. 429). As set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, Novell also objects to the admissibility of certain additional exhibits identified in SCO's Second Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures. Novell notes that SCO has identified as an exhibit "All declarations the parties have filed in this case and all exhibits to those declarations." Novell reserves the right to object to specific declarations and exhibits should SCO seek to admit them at trial. DATED: February 8, 2010 Respectfully submitted

By:

/s/ Sterling A. Brennan Sterling A. Brennan David R. Wright Kirk R. Harris Cara J. Baldwin WORKMAN | NYDEGGER Michael A. Jacobs, pro hac vice Eric M. Acker, pro hac vice Grant L. Kim, pro hac vice MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff NOVELL, INC.

sf-2801034

1