Leaper Footwear v. Nike et al
Filing
6
MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of C. Dale Quisenberry, Registration fee $ 15, receipt number 581950, filed by Plaintiff Leaper Footwear. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Application for Admission Pro Hac# 2 Exhibit B-ECF Registration# 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Belshe, James)
Leaper Footwear v. Nike et al
Doc. 6
Case 2:07-cv-00740-DB
Document 6
Filed 10/10/2007
Page 1 of 2
Larry R. Laycock (A4868) llaycock@wnlaw.com David R. Wright (A5164) dwright@wnlaw.com James B. Belshe (A9826) jbelshe@wnlaw.com
WORKMAN | NYDEGGER
1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-9800 C. Dale Quisenberry (TX24005040) Pro Hac Vice to be filed John T. Polasek (TX16088590) Pro Hac Vice to be filed 6750 West Loop South, Suite 920 Bellaire, Texas 77401 Telephone: (832) 778-6000 Attorneys for Plaintiff
POLASEK, QUISENBERRY & ERRINGTON, L.L.P.
LEAPER FOOTWEAR, LLC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) LEAPER FOOTWEAR, LLC, a Utah ) limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, AND ) APPLE, INC., a California corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-00740 DB MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION AND CONSENT OF LOCAL COUNSEL Honorable Judge Dee Benson
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:07-cv-00740-DB
Document 6
Filed 10/10/2007
Page 2 of 2
Pursuant
to
D.U.
Civ
Rule
83-1.1(d),
I
move
the
admission
of
C. Dale Quisenberry as pro hac vice counsel for Plaintiff, Leaper Footwear, LLC., and consent to serve as local counsel. The application for pro hac vice admission is attached as Exhibit A to this motion, an Electronic Case Filing Registration Form as Exhibit B, and the admission fee, if required, has been paid to the court with the submission of this motion. DATED this 10th day of October, 2007. /s/ James B. Belshe DAVID R. WRIGHT JAMES B. BELSHE WORKMAN NYDEGGER 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?