Leaper Footwear v. Nike et al

Filing 6

MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of C. Dale Quisenberry, Registration fee $ 15, receipt number 581950, filed by Plaintiff Leaper Footwear. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-Application for Admission Pro Hac# 2 Exhibit B-ECF Registration# 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Belshe, James)

Download PDF
Leaper Footwear v. Nike et al Doc. 6 Case 2:07-cv-00740-DB Document 6 Filed 10/10/2007 Page 1 of 2 Larry R. Laycock (A4868) llaycock@wnlaw.com David R. Wright (A5164) dwright@wnlaw.com James B. Belshe (A9826) jbelshe@wnlaw.com WORKMAN | NYDEGGER 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-9800 C. Dale Quisenberry (TX24005040) Pro Hac Vice to be filed John T. Polasek (TX16088590) Pro Hac Vice to be filed 6750 West Loop South, Suite 920 Bellaire, Texas 77401 Telephone: (832) 778-6000 Attorneys for Plaintiff POLASEK, QUISENBERRY & ERRINGTON, L.L.P. LEAPER FOOTWEAR, LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) LEAPER FOOTWEAR, LLC, a Utah ) limited liability company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NIKE, INC., an Oregon corporation, AND ) APPLE, INC., a California corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-00740 DB MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION AND CONSENT OF LOCAL COUNSEL Honorable Judge Dee Benson Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00740-DB Document 6 Filed 10/10/2007 Page 2 of 2 Pursuant to D.U. Civ Rule 83-1.1(d), I move the admission of C. Dale Quisenberry as pro hac vice counsel for Plaintiff, Leaper Footwear, LLC., and consent to serve as local counsel. The application for pro hac vice admission is attached as Exhibit A to this motion, an Electronic Case Filing Registration Form as Exhibit B, and the admission fee, if required, has been paid to the court with the submission of this motion. DATED this 10th day of October, 2007. /s/ James B. Belshe DAVID R. WRIGHT JAMES B. BELSHE WORKMAN NYDEGGER 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84111

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?