Dazzlesmile et al v. Epic Advertising et al

Filing 49

MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Donald A. Degnan, Registration fee $ 15, receipt number 10880000000001111588, filed by Defendant Neverblue Media. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Marshall, Romaine)

Download PDF
Romaine C. Marshall (9654) HOLLAND & HART LLP 222 S. Main Street, Suite 2200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 799-5800 Facsimile: (801) 799-5700 Donald A. Degnan (appearing pro hac vice) HOLLAND & HART LLP 1800 Broadway, Suite 300 Boulder, Colorado 80302 Telephone: (303) 473-2724 Attorneys for Defendant NeverBlue Media, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION DAZZLESMILE, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, and OPTIMAL HEALTH SCIENCE, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Plaintiffs, vs. Civil Action No. 2:09-CV-1043 EPIC ADVERTISING, INC., a purported Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner Delaware corporation AKA AZOOGLE.COM, INC., AKA AZOOGLEADS US INC., and AKA EPIC/AZOOGLE; AZOOGLE.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation; AZOOGLEADS US, INC., a non-public Delaware corporation; FAREND SERVICES LIMITED, a Cyprus registered company; JESSE DAVID WILLMS, an individual; 1021018 ALBERTA LTD, a Numbered Alberta Canadian Corporation AKA JUST THINK MEDIA; ATLAST HOLDINGS, INC., a Colorado corporation, d/b/a ATLAST FULFILLMENT; NEVERBLUE MEDIA, INC., a Canadian corporation; ORDER FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION G O O G L E , INC., a Delaware corporation; YAHOO! INC., a Delaware corporation; MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. It appearing to the Court that Petitioner meets the pro hac vice admission requirements of DUCiv. R. 83-1.1(d), the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Donald A. Degnan in the United States District Court, District of Utah in the subject case is GRANTED. DATED this ____ day of ________________, 2010. U. S. District Court Judge 4812325_1.DOC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?