Incentive Capital v. Camelot Entertainment Group et al

Filing 59

MOTION for Extension of Time Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Defendants Robert P. Atwell, Camelot Distribution Group, Camelot Entertainment Group, Camelot Film Group, Steven Istock, Jamie R. Thompson. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Samuel Alba.(Snow, John)

Download PDF
VAN COTT, BAGLEY, CORNWALL & McCARTHY John A. Snow (3025) Karen O’Brien (11739) Jonathan M. Levitan (Ca Bar No. 106798) admitted pro hac vice 36 South State Street, Suite 1900 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 532-3333 Facsimile: (801) 534-0058 Attorneys for Defendants Camelot Entertainment Group, Inc., Camelot Film Group, Inc., Camelot Distribution Group, Inc, Steven Istock, Robert P. Atwell and Jamie R. Thompson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION INCENTIVE CAPITAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CAMELOT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., ET. AL., ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT NO HEARING REQUESTED Case No. 2:11-CV-00288 Defendants. Judge Clark Waddoups Based upon the motion of the defendants on file herein, and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint is hereby GRANTED. Defendant’s Answer or other Response to the Complaint shall be filed on or before July 22, 2011. DATED this ____ day of June, 2011. BY THE COURT: Judge Clark Waddoups District Court Judge 4814-3851-5721, v. 2 2 411666v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?