Incentive Capital v. Camelot Entertainment Group et al

Filing 59

MOTION for Extension of Time Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Defendants Robert P. Atwell, Camelot Distribution Group, Camelot Entertainment Group, Camelot Film Group, Steven Istock, Jamie R. Thompson. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Samuel Alba.(Snow, John)

VAN COTT, BAGLEY, CORNWALL & McCARTHY
John A. Snow (3025) [e-mail]
Karen O’Brien (11739) [e-mail]
Jonathan M. Levitan (Ca Bar No. 106798) admitted pro hac vice
36 South State Street, Suite 1900
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants Camelot Entertainment
Group, Inc., Camelot Film Group, Inc., Camelot Distribution
Group, Inc, Steven Istock, Robert P. Atwell and Jamie R. Thompson

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

INCENTIVE CAPITAL, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAMELOT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP,
INC., ET. AL.,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
NO HEARING REQUESTED
Case No. 2:11-CV-00288

Defendants.
Judge Clark Waddoups

Based upon the motion of the defendants on file herein, and good cause
appearing:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Extend Time to
Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint is hereby GRANTED.

Defendant’s Answer or other Response to the Complaint shall be filed on or
before July 22, 2011.
DATED this ____ day of June, 2011.
BY THE COURT:

Judge Clark Waddoups
District Court Judge

4814-3851-5721, v. 2

2
411666v.1