Incentive Capital v. Camelot Entertainment Group et al
Filing
62
Plaintiff's MOTION for Extension of Time To Respond To Defendant Baer's Motion to Dismiss and Defendant Jarowey's Motion to Quash filed by Plaintiff Incentive Capital. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Samuel Alba.(Pia, Joseph)
Joseph G. Pia (9945)
Nathan S. Dorius (8977)
PIA ANDERSON DORIUS REYNARD & MOSS
222 South Main Street, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Telephone: (801) 350-9000
Facsimile: (801) 950-9010
E-mail: joe.pia@padrm.com
nathan@padrm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
INCENTIVE CAPITAL, LLC, a Utah Limited
Liability Company,
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
CAMELOT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP,
INC., a Delaware Corporation; CAMELOT
FILM GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation;
CAMELOT DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC.,
a Nevada Corporation, ROBERT P. ATWELL,
an individual; JAMIE R. THOMPSON, an
individual; STEVEN ISTOCK, an individual;
TED BAER, an individual; PETER
JAROWEY, an individual,
Civil No. 2:11-cv-00288
Judge Clark Waddoups
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to
Defendant Ted Baer’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and (2) Defendant Peter
Jarowey’s Motion to Quash Service. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s motion, having considered the
arguments by counsel, and otherwise being fully advised, the Court
HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES AS FOLLOWS:
The deadline for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Ted Baer’s Motion to Dismiss for
Lack of Jurisdiction and Defendant Peter Jarowey’s Motion to Quash Service shall be extended
five days after the Atwell Defendants file a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint.
DATED this ____ day of June, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
_____________________________
The Honorable Clark Waddoups
United States District Court for the
District of Utah
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?