Isys Technologies v. Google et al

Filing 40

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 2 Complaint filed by Plaintiff Isys Technologies. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Zenger, Todd)

Download PDF
Todd E. Zenger (5238) Dax D. Anderson (10168) KIRTON & McCONKIE 1800 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Phone: (801) 328-3600 Fax: (801) 321-4893 Email: tzenger@kmclaw.com Email: danderson@kmclaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-00507 CW Plaintiff, Judge Clark Waddoups vs. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation; ACER AMERICA CORP., a California Corporation; AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and BEST BUY CO., INC., a Minnesota Corporation; STIPULATED JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [JURY TRIAL DEMANDED] Defendant. Plaintiff ISYS Technologies, Inc., and Defendants Google, Inc., Samsung Electronics USA, Inc., Acer America Corp., Amazon.com, Inc., and Best Buy Co., Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), hereby stipulate to and move the Court for a one (1) week extension of time, up to and including July 5, 2011, for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Defendants’ response is currently due on June 28, 2011 or thereafter. No previous extensions have been sought. DATED this 28th day of June, 2011. KIRTON & McCONKIE By: s/Todd E. Zenger Todd E. Zenger Dax D. Anderson Attorneys for Plaintiff ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DATED this 28th day of June, 2011. COOLEY LLP Peter J. Willsey Brendan J. Hughes 777 6th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-3723 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN, LLP Roger Myers Robert Stolebarger Craig Buschmann 299 South Main Street, Suite 1800 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 By: /s/ Peter J. Willsey Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., ACER AMERICA CORP., AMAZON.COM, INC. AND BEST BUY CO., INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?