Isys Technologies v. Google et al
Filing
40
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 2 Complaint filed by Plaintiff Isys Technologies. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Zenger, Todd)
Todd E. Zenger (5238)
Dax D. Anderson (10168)
KIRTON & McCONKIE
1800 Eagle Gate Tower
60 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Phone: (801) 328-3600
Fax: (801) 321-4893
Email: tzenger@kmclaw.com
Email: danderson@kmclaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH
ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada
Corporation,
Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-00507 CW
Plaintiff,
Judge Clark Waddoups
vs.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation;
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; ACER AMERICA CORP., a
California Corporation; AMAZON.COM, INC., a
Delaware Corporation; and BEST BUY CO.,
INC., a Minnesota Corporation;
STIPULATED JOINT MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME
[JURY TRIAL DEMANDED]
Defendant.
Plaintiff ISYS Technologies, Inc., and Defendants Google, Inc., Samsung Electronics
USA, Inc., Acer America Corp., Amazon.com, Inc., and Best Buy Co., Inc. (collectively,
“Defendants”), hereby stipulate to and move the Court for a one (1) week extension of time, up
to and including July 5, 2011, for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.
Defendants’ response is currently due on June 28, 2011 or thereafter. No previous extensions
have been sought.
DATED this 28th day of June, 2011.
KIRTON & McCONKIE
By:
s/Todd E. Zenger
Todd E. Zenger
Dax D. Anderson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
DATED this 28th day of June, 2011.
COOLEY LLP
Peter J. Willsey
Brendan J. Hughes
777 6th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-3723
HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN, LLP
Roger Myers
Robert Stolebarger
Craig Buschmann
299 South Main Street, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
By: /s/ Peter J. Willsey
Attorneys for Defendants
GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC.,
ACER AMERICA CORP., AMAZON.COM, INC. AND
BEST BUY CO., INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?