Tafas v. Dudas et al

Filing 112

MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Brief and for Extension of Time by Polestar Capital Associates, LLC, Norseman Group, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Franco, Craig)

Download PDF
Tafas v. Dudas et al Doc. 112 Att. 1 Caase1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 112-2 C se 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 109 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 11of 22 Filed 12/19/2007 Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division TRIANTAFYLLOS TAFAS Plaintiff, v. JON W. DUDAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:07cv846 (JCC) CONSOLIDATED WITH SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, et al. Plaintiffs v. JON W. DUDAS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:07cv1008 (JCC) ORDER Upon consideration of the several motions for leave to file briefs as amici curiae in these consolidated cases, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) the Motions of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufactures of America, Biotechnology Industry Organization, Monsanto Company, Intellectual Property Institute of William Mitchell College of Law, and Elan Pharmaceutical Corporation for Leave to File Briefs as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs' Dockets.Justia.com Caase1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 112-2 C se 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ Document 109 Filed 12/18/2007 Page 22of 22 Filed 12/19/2007 Page of Anticipated Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; 2) the Motion of American Intellectual Property Law Association for Leave to File a Brief as Amicus Curiae on the Issue of Retroactivity of the New Rules is GRANTED; 3) any brief of amicus curiae shall be filed by December 27, 2007, and shall not exceed twenty (20) pages in length; and 4) the Clerk shall forward a copy of this Order to all Counsel of Record. December 18, 2007 Alexandria, Virginia _______________/s/_________________ James C. Cacheris UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?