Tafas v. Dudas et al

Filing 18

Memorandum in Support re 17 MOTION to Dismiss (Partial) filed by Jon Dudas, The United States Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order # 2 Exhibit 1 (Tables)# 3 Exhibit 2 (Final Rules)# 4 Exhibit 3 (Proposed Rules)# 5 Exhibit 4 (Young Declaration))(Wetzler, Lauren)

Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ

Document 18-3

Filed 10/04/2007

Page 1 of 1

TABLE 1 ARGUMENTS FOR DISMISSAL BY COUNT LACK OF JURISDICTION (Rule 12(b)(1)) LACK OF STANDING Count One ¶¶ 56(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n) LACK OF RIPENESS ¶¶ 56(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (j), (k), (l), (m), (n) ALL ¶¶ 71(c), (e), (f)

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Rule 12(b)(6))

Count Two Count Three

TABLE 2 BREAKDOWN OF COUNT ONE CLAIMS BY RULE LACK OF STANDING Lack of Constitutional Standing Rule 78 (Continuing Applications) Rule 114 (Requests for Continued Examination) Rule 75 (Claims) ¶¶ 56(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (k), (l), (m), (n) ¶ 56(j) Lack of Prudential Standing ¶¶ 56(b), (f), (g), (h), (k), (l), (m), (n) ¶ 56(j) LACK OF RIPENESS Unripe Because No Hardship ¶¶ 56(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (k), (l), (m), (n) ¶ 56(j) Unripe Because Not Fit for Judicial Resolution ¶¶ 56(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (k), (l), (m), (n) ¶ 56(j)

DEFENDANTS' EXHIBIT 1

¶ 56(a)

¶ 56(a)