Tafas v. Dudas et al
Filing
75
MOTION to Compel to Complete Administrative Record by SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham PLC, Glaxo Group Limited. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Reilly, Craig)
Tafas v. Dudas et al
Doc. 75 Att. 1
Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ
Document 75-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division ____________________________________ : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : JON W. DUDAS, et al., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________: TRIANTAFYLLOS TAFAS,
1:07cv846 (JCC/TRJ)
CONSOLIDATED WITH ____________________________________ : SMITHKLINE BEECHAM : CORPORATION, : d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : 1:07cv1008 (JCC/TRJ) : JON W. DUDAS, et al., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________: ORDER For the reasons stated from the bench, and in accord with specific rulings made at that time, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff GlaxoSmithKline's ("GSK's") motion to compel seeking limited discovery from the Defendants to complete the Administrative Record is GRANTED, and Defendants shall respond as follows:
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:07-cv-00846-JCC-TRJ
Document 75-2
Filed 11/20/2007
Page 2 of 2
1.
Defendants shall respond to GSK's Requests for Production of Documents and
Things to Defendants, which are attached as Exhibit A to GSK's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel and produce the documents requested therein. 2. Defendants shall respond to GSK's Requests for Interrogatories to Defendants,
which are attached as Exhibit B to GSK's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel. 3. This discovery shall be served by hand on or before December 14, 2007. Entered this ____ day of November 2007. Alexandria, Virginia __________________________________ Hon. Thomas Rawles Jones, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?