Rosetta Stone LTD v. Google Inc.

Filing 185

Joint MOTION to Seal by Google Inc., Rosetta Stone LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Allen, Warren)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ____________________________________ ROSETTA STONE LTD., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GOOGLE INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) Case No. 1:09-cv-00736 (GBL/TCB) PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO SEAL Upon consideration of Rosetta Stone Ltd.’s (“Rosetta Stone”) and Google Inc.’s (“Google”) Joint Motion to Seal the following documents:  Rosetta Stone’s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Omnibus Motion in Limine;  Declaration of Jennifer L. Spaziano in Support Thereof;  Google’s and Rosetta Stone’s respective responsive and rebuttal briefs to Rosetta Stone’s Omnibus Motion in Limine, and any declarations in support of those responsive or rebuttal briefs;  Google’s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Omnibus Motion in Limine;  Declaration of Jonathan B. Oblak in Support Thereof;  Rosetta Stone’s and Google’s respective responsive and rebuttal briefs to Google’s Omnibus Motion in Limine, and any declarations in support of those responsive or rebuttal briefs (hereinafter the “Joint Motion”) and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion is GRANTED: 1. The filings identified above reference documents, testimony, and information that relate to business practices and internal communications that are confidential and proprietary, the public disclosure of which would be harmful to Rosetta Stone’s and/or Google’s business interests. 2. Reasonable public notice of the sealing of these documents has been given through the filings in this case. 3. No less restrictive method would adequately preserve the confidential and proprietary nature of the information at issue. Dated: April __, 2010 ______________________________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?