I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 100

Memorandum in Support re 99 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff IP Engine, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Defendants' Compliance with this Court's Scheduling Order, or Alternatively, Motion for Protective Order filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512
)
AOL, INC. et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE, INC’S MOTION TO
COMPEL DEFENDANTS’ COMPLIANCE WITH THIS COURT’S SCHEDULING
ORDER, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

This Court, having considered Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc’s Motion to Compel Defendant’s
Compliance with this Court’s Scheduling Order, or Alternatively, Motion for Protective Order,
and finding good cause exists, hereby ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED as follows:
1.

Defendants must comply with paragraph 13(c) of the Scheduling Order by

identifying the top ten claim terms to be construed.
2.

[Or alternatively, Plaintiff is granted a Protective Order excusing it from

Defendants’ demands that Plaintiff disclose proposed constructions and supporting intrinsic and
extrinsic evidence for virtually every limitation in the asserted claims.]
So Ordered:
Dated: March ___, 2012

_________________________________
Raymond A. Jackson, United States District Judge
United States District Court
Eastern District of Virginia

DSMDB-3042300v1