I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 147

Declaration re 145 Opposition (of Emily O'Brien) in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Google's Custodial Document Production by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y)(Noona, Stephen)

DICKSTEINSHAPI
825
TEL

Eye

202

NW

Street

24

DC 20006-5403

Washington

202

420-2200

January

ROLLP

420-2201

dicksteinshapirocom

2012

Via E-mail

David Perison Esq
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart

Sullivan

LLP

50 California Street 22nd Floor

CA

San Francisco

Re

94111

17 2011 Meet and Confer

January

Teleconference

Dear David

Thank you

for

with
letter

and confer

as

your characterizations
The

January

23 2012

we

were

have preliminarily

parties

I/P

document

agreed

for

Google

Jonathan McPhie

and Rishi Khaitan

to

to

respond

I/P

and

Engine does not agree

comments of your
conduct custodial

Furrow Bryan Horling

using

correct

17 2012

productions

familiar with the

Huber Hal Varian Jonathan Alferness Bartholomew
Matt Kulick

Engine writes

on January

teleconference

search terms and outstanding

to

respect

dated

letter

the meet

further clarify

With

your

at least

the following

January
searches
Daniel

2012
for

Jeff

Wright

agreed-upon

search terms

5867799

664

or

420

or

I/P

or

799

/2

patent

6775664

or 6775664

or 10/045198

6314420

or 6314420

or 09/204149

pat w/4

664

w/4

appl

5867799

or

or

198

420
149

or

Engine

Andrew

Ken

w/3

Lang

Don

w/3

Kosak

or

Donald

or

demand

search

scan

/3

content

search /3

based

collaborative

network
or content-based

filter

feedback

filter

data

inlormon
Lycos
content

Los Angeles

New

/2

profile

York

Orange

County

Silicon

Valley

Stamford

Washington

DC
DSMDB-3020693

DICKSTEINSHAPIROLLP
David Perison Esq

24

January

2012

Page

collaborative

or collaborative

filter

/10

filtering

content

or content

filter

filtering

hybrid

/2

/2

or hybrid

filter

filtering

Wisewire

These search terms
The

used

search terms are relevant terms

terms they

to

of the remaining terms are directed
last
I/P

term hybrid

primarily

and not
it

proposed

that

accusation

I/P

Engine

current
right

to

request

I/P

or things

during

with

such as Defendants

and

provided

custodial

third

for

further

requested
assist

search terms
should

further

call that

Google

below

for

not be interpreted

its

I/P

discussions

list

is

I/P

requests

Googles
the

to

and reserves

basis based

the

to

Engine agrees

exhaustive

reasonable

the

upon information

of Googles document

Defendants are complying

requests

with

Nos 26-30

production

discovery

independent of custodial searches

Engine also understood
analysis regarding

Request

their

33-50 and 58-63

Engine expects the same

I/P

and/or

Document

how

that

investigation

information

our meet

during

Nos

19

31

obligations

Googles
as binding

and confer

and

with respect

20

to

would

Google

that

the advertising

systems

based on the

with

it

I/P

During
another

proposed

searches

andlor

exhaustive

I/P

list

17th

e.g

listing

Engines proposed

and are preliminary

I/P

Engine

teleconference

of search terms

the requested

with

obligations

search terms

the January

Engine provides

custodial

was Googles

technical

Google-related

32 and 51-57

Engine provide

with

that

reason

this

Engine asked Google
document

although

this

Engine Document Request

relying upon

1-25

I/P

For

search terms

discussion

searches

that

its

The

and useful search terms

of helpful

related document

parties

applicable

Document Request Nos
Google

I/P

financial

related to

Thus what remained
to

least

list

Document Request Nos 64-75

of other defendants

respect

at

relevant

search for documents

previously

to

I/P

Engines

I/P

complete review

upon

from the

non-technical

to

of

all

warranted on

during

or obtains

understands

respect

which correspond

Engines

discovers

it

the patents-in-suit

of the patents-in-suit or Plaintiff

reason

17th teleconference

if

with

Two

of the patents-in-suit or Plaintiff

does not agree

it

custodians

discovery

further

Engine

obligations

I/P

custodians

additional

this

same

the patents-in-suit

both incorrect and counterproductive

is

establishing

the January

during

of Google

list

documents
receives

stated

to

Googles knowledge

of the call which was

objective

For

the exact

Googles agreed-upon search

that

and discussions

responsive

Engine was unprepared

I/P

associated

17th teleconference

or documents

search for documents

to

uses

Google

term proposed by Google

is

filtering

unless

those discussing

entities

knowledge

business

on issues other than

other than

corporate

the January

Google

to

Googles own

to

focused

As

related

to

or hybrid

filter

Engine observed during

terms

the patents-in-suit

in

Seven of the next ten

the patents-in-suit or Plaintiff

to

not identify any documents

will

of the patents-in-suit or Plaintiff

knowledge

Google

search terms solely relate

eight

first

primarily relate

To

of proposed

search terms

and based upon an

DSMDB-3020693

IC

APIR

KSTE INS

OLLP

David Perison Esq
January

24

2012

Page

incomplete

review of Googles document

lIP

production

the following

Engine provides

of

list

search terms

Term

Rationale

Quality Score

I/P

Engine seeks

information

referenced

on G-I/P

how

represented

AdWords

LPQ

or

Landing

Quality and

that

score

determined
score

QBB

w/5

pCTR

is

that

score

Relevance

I/P

or

and Inventory

or

Ads

is

used

score that

It

in

determined

based on

score

is

not

documents

appear

but

quality score

Relevance

score

the Quality

0146189

Keyword

spam score

I/P

is

that

how

is

This

MEU

I/P

it

score

I/P

is

is

determined

or

It

Engine seeks

Ads Coverage

on

the

the

system independent of
Engine

I/P

how

that

appears

is

to best locate

to

open

any

documents

on page G-I/P

the score referenced

information

used

in

related to the

on G-I/P

Engine-

represented

and discussed

quality score

information

represented

for

represented

and discussed

Google

MEU

e.g how
at

is

that

is

is

MBU

e.g how
at

it

that

Google

related to the

on G-IIP Engine-0146187

e.g

at

disabling

related to the

and discussed

information

Keyword spam

Engine-0146189

on G-IIP Engine-0 146187

Engine seeks

referenced

so I/P

for generating

determined by

referenced

Engine seeks

determined

Google
Relevance

that

of course would not necessarily include

determined

referenced

MBU

the Inventory

e.g
at

determined and represented

Engine seeks

score

is

Relevance

and discussed

be responsible

by Google

how

it

This

Engine-0146189

Score calculations

suggestions
explaining

is

how

for disabling

team name on documents

their

QBB pCTR
Google

at

Google

at

is

it

This

Google

related to the

represented

to

score

disabling

and discussed

term

the

89 e.g how

at

the capitalization

defined

LPQ

Engine-01461 89 e.g

on G-I/P

mentioning

teams who

for

is

Google

at

related to the

information

appears

is

Engine-01461

quality score

referenced

is

in

and discussed

on G-I/P

is

it

used

it

related to the

information

represented

how

it

discussed

is

quality score

Engine seeks

how

Coverage

in

referenced

is

determined

Relevance score

on G-I/P

represented

used

it

information

Engine seeks

I/P

how

and

referenced

is

is

system

Engine seeks

l/P

Page

e.g how

Engine-0146189

calculated

it

Score

related to the Quality

it

is

Google

DSMDB-3020693

DICKSTEINSHAPIROLLP
David Perison Esq
January

24

2012

Page

Term

Rationale

and Ads

Disabling

I/P

Engine seeks

system as discussed

Engine seeks

the ads
to

Engine-0 146190

I/P

in

Engine-0 146186

on pages G-I/P

I/P

Ads Quality

on Disabling

information

which

ads

described

is

focus

information

and

we

In particular

from content
be the team

ads

Ads

of our

the relevance

improving

focus

Quality team

100 Googlers who

group of over

as

on maintaining

on the

on search ads

as

distinguished

This appears
Engine-0 146186
for the relevance
responsible

G-JIP

directly

to

calculation

SmartASS and DumbASS

I/P

Engine seeks
and

differences

SmartAss and

I/P

pCTR

Engine seeks

information
testing

results

on the

similarities

between

how

and

these two

systems

SmartAss computes

information

on

information

on the architecture and use of

pCTR

Ad Shard

I/P

Engine seeks

Ad Shards
Media

Empirical

I/P

as described

Engine seeks

on G-I/P

Engine-00088 19
on the Empirical

any Google

discussions

information

on where

Google

utilizes

on where

Google

utilizes

Media company
Adwords

User Feedback

and

I/P

or clickthrough

I/P

Engine seeks

user feedback
Click-through

CTR

or click

through

or

Engine

CTR

and

seeks

in

Ad Words

information

Ad Words

in

Adwords
Virtuous

Circle

I/P
this

Relevance

and holy grail

Conversion

rate

I/P
this
I/P
this

revenue

per search

I/P
this
I/P

coverage

this
I/P

depth

this

cost

I/P

per click

or

Engine reserves

based upon

CPC

I/P

Engine seeks

reasonably

information documents

relevant to

Google

use

of

information

relevant to

Googles

use

of

information

relevant to

Googles

use

of

information

relevant to

Google

use

of

information

relevant to

Google

use

of

information

relevant to

Googles

use

of

information

on where

term
Engine seeks

term
Engine seeks
term
Engine seeks
term
Engine seeks
term
Engine seeks

term
Engine seeks

CPC
the right to

information

utilizes

Ad Words

in

request

or things

Google

it

additional

discovers

custodians

during

and/or

search terms

complete review

of Googles

DSMDB-3020693

DIC KST

HAP IRO

IN

David Perlson Esq

24

January

2012

Page

production receives

document

has

example Google
defenses
and/or

If

licenses

to

the right

reserves

With respect

to

productions

17 2012

including

Engine

is

concerned

very

document

the parties

Unless Google

productions

we

With respect

to

explained

its

Mr

third

documents

able to
this

your January
by

produced

and

will

Mr

providing

in

stating

the

technical

16b

it

connection

Engine

is

Engine also
relevant

capture

below and

your January 23rd

to

on Googles comments

there are no other anticipated
there are numerous

to

between

the search term discussion
dates for

that

reiterated

was

activities

not causing

of

has

it

appropriate

with

all

its

pending

on February 13 2012

conference

Engine

I/P

document

to

previously

review

the Lycos and

an inappropriate
to

review

before

practice

We

delay

the third

supplementing
currently

or near the

at

occurring

of which were held by Google

some

basis to

document

discussed

Based
that

Engine intends

I/P

or any reduction

No

I/P

Engine noted

I/P

Google agreed
receive

November

identified

in

I/P

as

although

production

why

Instead

pass-along

more

4th

asserted

document

robust

it

Engine explained
its

incorrect

and

is

for

it

infringement

The

week

for
its

as

party

response

are reviewing those

see

each system

has

documents
contentions

of your January
on an expedited
early in the
the parties

Engine providing
and

paragraphs
identified

by

articulated

previously
sentence

agreement between

as follows I/P

and claim charts

productions

that

the second

that

produce technical

supplemental

Stipulation

claims

position

would

documents was

based on those technical

preliminary

to

timely supplement

basis in order to then

articulated

I/P

receive

According

upon

Engine

I/P

and Lycos

Lang

on

Additionally

letter

No

Lycos

Regarding Googles Interrogatory
positions

offer concrete

letter

the date of conception

documents

case

licenses in

week

pipeline

issue at the Rule

productions

23rd

should

it

of production

Engine has explained

with

that

Engine understands

I/P

Interrogatory

work

provided

13 2012

thus

IACs

Engine received

are not dependent

that

party document

of the inventors

this

the slow pace

is

I/P

positions

being

revenue data

raise

to

Googles

in

its

modify

comparable

allegedly

above

and custodians

terms

of weeks

couple

the short term

in

requests

intend

mentioned

regarding

any

from prior litigations

transcripts

about

productions

outstanding

before

if

its

based on such

information

yet to produce patent

which

Engine understands

17th teleconference

document

time

has

discussed

I/P

productions

the next

in

produce Google

the January

Lang

defenses

the search

append

I/P

deposition

agreements

will

Google

Google

capture

or identify

its

support

document

anticipated

relevant licensing

during

to

upon

relevant

of

support

the right to

Engine reserves

Further Google

requests

modify andlor

to

of January

production

I/P

rely

I/P

in

alternatives

non-infringing

to

For

further investigation

upon

based on any such identification

information

letter

document

Engines

intends

it

and custodians

alternatives

non-infringing
I/P

or obtains

discovery

any allegedly

identify

the search terms

append

to

during

does make such identifications

Google

purportedly
response

yet

to

I/P

its

is

early

Defendants

Engines

claim

D5MDB-3020693

ICKSTE IN

AP

IROLLP

David Perison Esq

24

January

2012

Page

charts

see

and

and Defendants

Answers

contentions

did not agree

in

I/P

Engine will however
documents

technical

in

supplementation

2011

I/P

complete

is

Proposed

its

documents

producing

deposition

unidentified
considers

to

be similar to

those accused

cases and Google-specific
January
in

its

13th letter

email

has passed

We

of December
In that

Deposition

note that

Google

familiar with your January

is

Google

is

unilaterally

reports from those

transcript as mentioned

trial

to

Google

employees from certain as yet

expert

agreed

that

13th

in

its

produce some of those documents

month

produce them even though more than

to produce the following

LLC

Engine Tools

al

et

the Eastern

for

cases

the following

for

employees

Yahoo Inc

Court

States District

United

under separate cover

provided

non-infringement

Response

parties

expectation

review of Google

its

that

of current or former Google

transcripts

TJW

agreed

to

and the

documents

of the technology

case

to

paragraphs
file their

supplemental

Engine understands

I/P

previously

2011 and has yet

email Google

Paid Search

Engine

aspects

in this

of the Bright

portions

21

I/P

position

regarding

litigations

robust

finished

from current and former Google

transcripts

Ad Words

and

date certain for such

Plan previously

and Googles avoidance of taking

response

more

has

it

Engine has proposed

Discovery

Regarding Googles prior litigation

once

claim charts

its

of

see

parties

based upon such an unarticulated

Stipulation

supplement

all

see paragraph

transfer

based on those technical

early in the case

November

the

seek

not

to

agreement

for

discovery

There never was any discussion

see paragraph

infringement

of written

the opening

and

paragraphs

Case

District

No

207-cv-403

of Texas Marshall

Division

United

United

Bright

Court

States District

Performance

LLC

Response

Marshall

Court

Personalized
States District

et

for

F/K/A

Inc

Case

No

District

et

the Eastern

al

States District

207-cv-582-RGD/TEM
of Virginia

Case

District

IP LLC

Polaris

United

al

the Eastern

Google

Court

States District

No

of Texas Marshall

Inc

Google
Court

207-cv-432-RRR

et

al

Division

Case

No

the Eastern

District

207-cv-480-DF

United

for

of

Division

PA Advisors LLC
District

for

Pricing Inc

207-cv-371-TJW-CE
Texas

AOL LLC

LLC

Bid for Position

for

Google

the Eastern

User Model
Court

Non-infringement expert

for

Inc

et

al

the District

No

of Texas Marshall

District

LLP

Case

Google

Inc

Case

No

States

Division

09-525-LPS United

of Delaware

reports in the above

stated

cases

DSMDB-3020693

DICKSTEINSHAPIROLLP
David Perison Esq

24

January

2012

Page

Expert

deposition

December 22 2011

In our email on

documents

litigation

from experts

transcripts

I/P

to

further

on non-infringement

assist

Google

the following

Engine provided

in

of additional

list

of additional

the production
prior

prior

Ad Words

litigations

Paid Search

Engine Tools

LLC

Google

Inc

and

Paid Search

Engine Tools

LLC

Google

Inc

et

Function

Media LLC

Overture

Google

CDCA

Xerox Corp

Google

Walker

LLC

Digital

Desenberg

Although

some

believe

that

present

Inc

Google

Google
that

has

Google

No 49

No

Document Request

Google

employee

All hearing

relevant ones

to

in

our

AB

al 111

et

-cv-00558

D.Del

are relevant to

litigations

of these

from

relevant

all

litigations

of these

prior

documents

as

I/P

Engine

I/P

are not relevant

see

litigations

Engine

requested

to

the issues in the

litigations

AdWords

from the second list

litigation

led I/P

17th teleconference

in

I/P

Engine

the

six

reiterates

I/P

agreed-

its

Engine

December 16 2011 email

discovery responses

responses

contentions

pleadings

All pleadings

All fact

50 and

discovery

Dispositive

identified

all

TXED

207-cv-279

D.Del

the January

of these

identify which

of the following

production

during

all

produce documents
For

TXED

SDNY

08-cv-10121

yet to

upon above plus any additional
for

110-cv-00136

Communications

does not believe

Document Request

request

al

Googles comments

litigation

l-cv-00306

TXED

08-cv-061

2002

et

Axis

Google

of

Engine requests

Inc

al 21

Inc and Yahoo Inc

Google

Corp

Microsoft

which

was

attached

declaration

from

current or former Google

contentions

and

trial

deposition

transcripts

transcripts

trial

transcripts

of current or former Google

employees deposition

transcripts

All expert

reports expert

reports

DSMDB-3020693

DICKSTEINSHAPIROLLP
David Perison Esq

24

January

2012

Page

All expert

deposition

deposition transcripts

transcripts

All judgments

and orders

All appellate briefs

contentions

All settlement agreements

Motions

limine pleadings

in

orders

Pretrial

Rule 50/59

motion pleadings

contentions

Daubert pleadings

Regarding
document

With respect

to

30b6

depose each

Rule

our discussions

to

26a

witness

the ten deposition
request

to

exceed

Engine intends
take
for
that

one

14

currently

to

30b6

limit
that

if

We

Google
by no

discussed

January

10 2012

has

later

and

fact

time

for

all

in

for

than

from

production

will

16b
one

of each Defendant equal

disclosed

respond

as people

lists

in subsequent

23rd

position

letter

request

conference

30b6
to

the
to

likely

Google

provide

right

pursuant

to

to

from

depart

not oppose

is

reasonable
leave

seeking

for

deposition

I/P

to

damages

number of individuals
have discoverable
disclosures

supplemental

that

Please

may

they

such

they believe

each defendant

definitive

we

that

for

disclosure

been disclosed

to

addition

have the

should

it

in

that

Defendants will not agree

with the Rule

26a

recent

issues
has

have indicated

they

have been unable

parties

Engine believes

connection

depositions

January

and who

defendants

although

liability

not taken

I/P

and on damages

defendant

based upon your January

Lycos most

We

with

any individuals

17th teleconference
letter

10 2012

January

document

proposal the

depositions

in their sole determination

deposition

Engine understands

position

this

fact

issues

liability

affiliated

motion

information including

although

on

Defendants

the specific

number of

individuals
at

file

each Defendant

any received

deposition

regarding

the

deposition

fact

Lycos

Engine received

I/P

19 2012 and awaits

Center which was due January 16 2012

Research

agreement regarding
Rule

to

productions

on January

production

the Palo Alto

reach

party document

third

may

oppose

Defendants

this

I/P

motion

definitive

27 2012
third

party document

are investigating
to

Googles

production

the nature

questions

As we mentioned

of Lycos

comments

in

during

its

the

January

under separate cover

DSMDB-3020693

DICKSTEINSHAPIROLLP
David Perlson Esq
January

24

2012

Page

Please do not hesitate

to

contact

us if you have

any questions

1es

202

420-5167

MonterioCdicksteinshapiro.com

CJM/

cc

Stephen

Noona

David Bilsker
Kenneth
Jeffrey

DeAnna

Brothers

Sherwood
Allen

DSMDB-3020693