I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 309

Memorandum in Support re 277 MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512
)
AOL, INC. et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE, INC.’S
SECOND MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS
REGARDING UNTIMELY DISCOVERY RESPONSES
This Court, having considered Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Second Motion For Discovery
Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses and accompanying Memorandum in
Support thereof, and finding good cause exists, hereby ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED
as follows:
Defendants are hereby precluded from using in any form (including any reliance thereon
by their experts), for any purpose in this litigation:
1. Google’s First Supplemental and Second Supplemental Responses to I/P Engine’s
Interrogatory No. 15, served on August 29, and September 13, respectively, which is
directed to Google’s revenues for its U.S. based properties.
2. Emails and the information provided therein produced as Bates Nos. G-IPE-0888897,
G-IPE-0888898-99, G-IPE-0888900 and G-IPE-888901-02.
3. Google’s Supplemental Response to I/P Engine’s Interrogatory No. 9, served on
August 30, which is directed to Google’s non-infringing alternatives contentions.
So Ordered:
Dated: September __, 2012

_________________________________
United States District Court
Eastern District of Virginia

DSMDB-3099617