I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 310

Declaration re 307 MOTION in Limine #5 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Damages Against AOL Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc. and Target Corporation, 301 MOTION in Limine #2 to Exclude Evidence of Entire Market Value of Accused Products and of Defendants' Size, Wealth and Overall Revenues, 303 MOTION in Limine #3 to Exclude Marketing and High-Level Non-Technical Materials Related to Historical Click-Through Rate, 305 MOTION in Limine #4 to Preclude Plaintiff from Offering Evidence or Argument Relating to Defendants' Conduct During Discovery or to Google's Unproduced Licenses, 299 MOTION in Limine #1 to Preclude Plaintiff From Introducing Evidence of Willful Infringement, Pre-Suit Knowledge, or Copying of Joshua L. Sohn in Support of Defendants' Motions in Limine by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J)(Noona, Stephen)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT J 1 1 STATES UNITED DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 3 NORFOLK DIVISION 4 x 5 I/P ENGINE, INC., 6 7 Plaintiff, v. : Civ. Action No. : 2:11-cv-512 8 AOL, INC., et al., 9 Defendants. 10 x 11 12 13 CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY 14 Videotaped Deposition of KEITH RAYMOND UGONE, Ph.D. 15 Dallas, Texas 16 Friday, September 14, 2012 17 9:02 a.m. 18 19 20 21 22 23 Job No. 26021 24 Pages: 1 - 237 25 Reported by: Tami Lewis, RMR, CRR, CSR CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEITH RAYMOND UGONE, Ph.D. CONDUCTED ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 34 1 proxy/yardstick/benchmark approach, which is a different 09:44:45 2 approach than -- than what Dr. Becker took, which was 09:44:45 3 the apportionment approach. 09:44:47 4 Q. Right. So you haven't tried to apportion out 09:44:50 5 those functionalities that are asserted to be separable 09:44:52 6 and noninfringing? You haven't tried to do that, have 09:44:56 7 you? 09:45:01 8 9 A. I would say from an indicator of value 09:45:01 perspective, but I haven't come up with a percent, that 09:45:12 10 20 percent of the revenues are due to the alleged 09:45:15 11 infringement of the patents-in-suit, so I don't have 09:45:19 12 that number, but I've done it through what I call this 09:45:21 13 proxy/benchmark/yardstick approach. 09:45:24 18 A. I do. That was also in combination with some 09:45:50 19 other things, but I believe I make that statement, and 09:45:54 20 I'm also relying upon the testimony of one of the 09:45:56 21 in-house counsel at Google as well as, Mr. Ma -- 09:46:02 22 Maccoun? 09:46:05 23 Q. Maccoun? 09:46:05 24 A. Maccoun. I can't pronounce his name, but yes. 09:46:06 25 Q. I think it's Maccoun. 09:46:09 CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY PLANET DEPOS I 888.433.3767 I WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEITH RAYMOND UGONE, Ph.D. CONDUCTED ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 35 A. Maccoun, okay. 2 5 6 09:46:09 09:46:13 A. I -- actually, I need to say one more thing. I'm sorry. 09:46:21 09:46:27 7 Q. Sure. 09:46:27 8 A. If I could go back. So there was the license 09:46:27 9 agreements, patent license agreements. There is Mr. 09:46:30 10 Maccoun's deposition testimony, and then I also spoke 09:46:34 11 with him directly. And I think we tried to always 09:46:36 12 indicate for you, you know, when those took place, so 09:46:40 13 hopefully we footnoted everything appropriately and you 09:46:44 14 can tell that. But never in my wildest dreams would I 09:46:47 15 have thought that that word "strong" was inappropriate. 09:46:51 16 Q. So it's your understanding that based on your 09:46:55 17 communications with Mr. Maccoun, you're paraphrasing 09:47:02 18 what he said? 09:47:07 19 A. And deposition testimony and then observed 09:47:08 20 preference in marketplace with the license agreements. 09:47:12 21 Q. Okay. And you've stated that an indicator of 09:47:12 22 that is the inbound licenses and acquisitions of Google, 09:47:16 23 right? 09:47:16 24 A. That's one of those three, yes. 09:47:21 25 Q. Did you review all of Google's inbound 09:47:22 CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY PLANET DEPOS I 888.433.3767 I WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEITH RAYMOND UGONE, Ph.D. CONDUCTED ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 36 1 licenses? 09:47:27 2 A. That were produced in this case, yes. 09:47:28 3 Q. What about that weren't produced in this case? 09:47:30 4 A. I haven't seen -- let's try it this way. 09:47:32 5 Here's the best answer I can give you. I have reviewed 09:47:37 6 what was produced in this case. I did not go back and 09:48:06 7 look at any other cases that I might have -- we talked 09:48:06 8 about the other case. I didn't go back and look at 09:48:06 9 those license agreements, but I would be very surprised 09:48:06 10 if I reached a different conclusion. If I had done 09:48:06 11 that, but with respect to the materials produced in this 09:48:06 12 case that I'm aware of at least, I did review those, if 09:48:06 13 that answers your question. 09:48:06 14 Q. Sure. You didn't go back and ask Google to 09:48:06 15 look at all of its inbound licenses before you made that 09:48:09 16 opinion, right? 09:48:12 17 A. I did not ask that question, and just to make 09:48:14 18 sure it's clear, I think when I was talking about 09:48:18 19 various ranges and describing those licenses, I was 09:48:22 20 always very careful, I believe, to say produced in this 09:48:28 21 case. 09:48:30 22 Q. Okay. 09:48:30 23 A. So I do recognize that there might be some 09:48:30 24 licenses I haven't seen that for whatever reason aren't 09:48:32 25 relevant to this case that haven't been produced. 09:48:35 CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY PLANET DEPOS I 888.433.3767 I WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEITH RAYMOND UGONE, Ph.D. CONDUCTED ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 37 1 Q. Right. 09:48:37 2 A. So I suppose one could say, you know, looking 09:48:38 3 at the license agreements that were produced that were 09:48:40 4 deemed relevant in this case by however that process 09:48:42 5 happens, okay, that I drew the conclusions that I did. 09:48:46 6 7 8 Q. Okay. Did you look at any of Google's outbound licenses? A. We looked at -- everything we looked at that 09:48:49 09:48:53 09:48:54 was in -- was in the report, so there were all those 09:48:58 10 inbound license agreements. There was also, you know -- 09:49:02 11 I think there were some technology agreements and so 09:49:04 12 forth. I would have to look, but as I'm sitting here 09:49:07 13 right now, I don't remember any outbound, perhaps with 09:49:10 14 an asterisk. 09:49:20 9 15 Q. Right. You didn't ask to see any of their 09:49:21 16 outbound licenses other than if they were produced in 09:49:25 17 this case? 09:49:27 18 A. Correct. 09:49:27 19 Q. Okay. Do you know what I mean when I say the 09:49:28 20 Georgia-Pacific factor number 2? 09:49:32 21 A. Yes. 09:49:35 22 Q. Okay. Would you agree that -- if I say GP, 09:49:35 23 will you understand that I mean Georgia-Pacific? 09:49:41 24 A. I can handle that. 09:49:42 25 Q. Okay. Good. Would you agree that GP 2 09:49:43 CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY PLANET DEPOS I 888.433.3767 I WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEITH RAYMOND UGONE, Ph.D. CONDUCTED ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 38 1 requires consideration of licenses that relate to 09:49:48 2 patents comparable to the patents-in-suit? 09:49:52 3 A. I do not disagree that that is the concept, 09:49:55 4 that obviously in Georgia-Pacific factor 2, you can't 09:50:08 5 have an exact match. 09:50:15 6 Q. Right. 09:50:16 7 A. Because if you did, that would be GP factor 1, 09:50:16 8 and that would be for the plaintiff. So I view GP 09:50:19 9 factor 2, as well as some other things, as kind of 09:50:23 10 falling into my house analogy that I gave you 09:50:27 11 previously. Now, the only reason why I'm giving a 09:50:32 12 little bit longer answer is that there's probably 09:50:34 13 degrees of comparability, and so that would go into the 09:50:36 14 mix a little bit because, you know, they're going to be 09:50:43 15 a first cousin or a second cousin. So, I think, you 09:50:48 16 know, the damage quantifier will, you know, have to be 09:50:51 17 cognizant of that. 09:50:54 18 Q. Well, would you consider -- strike that. 09:50:56 19 In determining a comparable license, you 09:51:03 20 generally have two considerations. First, it would be 09:51:08 21 whether it has a comparable technology. And I 09:51:16 22 understand the -- what -- your statement relating to 09:51:21 23 whether it's first cousin or second cousin, but it still 09:51:24 24 has to have comparable technology, right, at some level? 09:51:28 25 A. With -- with the caveat that you said, yes. 09:51:30 CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY PLANET DEPOS I 888.433.3767 I WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEITH RAYMOND UGONE, Ph.D. CONDUCTED ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 188 1 Q. Okay. You haven't seen any documents? 03:06:05 2 A. I -- I think I even said that in my answer. 03:06:07 3 Q. Okay. And -- 03:06:09 4 A. But -- but what I was saying is entirely 03:06:10 5 consistent with my understanding of how firms behave in 03:06:12 6 this high-tech world. 03:06:20 7 Q. Okay. And I think my question was in your -- 03:06:21 8 your report, you don't state that Google believed at the 03:06:25 9 time of the negotiation that the patents were valid, 03:06:29 right? 03:06:29 10 11 12 A. That was a couple of questions ago, but I think I answered that as correct. 03:06:33 03:06:36 N 16 A. Correct. 03:06:54 17 N 03:06:54 20 A. Correct. 03:07:15 21 - 03:07:03 24 A. Correct. 03:07:14 25 IN 03:07:18 CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY PLANET DEPOS I 888.433.3767 I WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM 3 4 8 A. I have not said that in my report if that's what you're asking. A. Correct. 03:07:32 03:07:34 03:07:44 1.1 12 13 A. Of -- of those two buckets that I had identified, yes. 03:08:03 03:08:06 14 Q. Okay. When -- 03:08:06 15 A. As I said very early on this morning, I tacked 03:08:10 16 17 on that phrase of the licenses produced in this case. Q. Okay. So you haven't looked at or asked to 03:08:13 03:08:15 18 look at all of Google's licenses outside those produced 03:08:17 19 in this case? 03:08:24 20 A. Correct. 03:08:24 21 Q. Okay. 03:08:26 THE WITNESS: We may be at an hour if it's 22 23 convenient. 03:08:47 03:08:49 24 MS. ALBERT: Oh, sure. 03:08:50 25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Off the record, 3:08. 03:08:51 CONFIDENTIAL VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF KEITH RAYMOND UGONE, Ph.D. CONDUCTED ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 190 1 (Recess taken.) 03:08:55 2 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are on the record. 03:28:55 3 4 The time is 3:28. Q. (BY MS. ALBERT) Dr. Ugone, you're familiar 03:28:56 03:29:08 5 with the Ben Love presentation, right? 03:29:10 6 A. I'm -- I'm familiar with the? 03:29:13 7 Q. Ben Love presentation, the one that Dr. Becker 03:29:15 8 9 10 cites to and that you -A. The one that I call the draft presen -- draft presentation? 03:29:20 03:29:22 03:29:26 11 Q. No, the 20 to 40 percent. 03:29:26 12 A. Oh, okay. Yes. 03:29:29 13 Q. Okay. So I'm going to call it the Love 03:29:29 14 presentation -- 03:29:32 15 A. Okay. 03:29:32 16 Q. -- just for efficiency's sake. Is it your 03:29:32 17 understanding that that presentation was an internal 03:29:35 18 presentation given to Google employees? 03:29:37 19 A. I believe so, yes. 03:29:41 20 Q. And is it your understanding that Google relies 03:29:43 21 on accurate data in creating presentations for its 03:29:54 22 employees? 03:29:56 23 A. That would have to be an assumption. I didn't 03:29:56 24 ask anybody, but I would assume that a professional 03:29:58 25 organization would do that. 03:30:01 CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY PLANET DEPOS I 888.433.3767 I WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?