I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 336

Memorandum in Support re 335 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion in Limine to Exclude Improper Prior Art Evidence filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
AOL, INC. et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
I/P ENGINE, INC.,

Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE, INC.’S
THIRD MOTION IN LIMINE TO
EXCLUDE IMPROPER PRIOR ART EVIDENCE
This Court, having considered Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Motion In Limine To Exclude
Improper Prior Art Evidence, hereby ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED as follows:
Defendants are hereby precluded from seeking or relying on testimony from Messrs.
Culliss, Ortega, and Rose in this litigation.

So Ordered:
Dated: September __, 2012

_________________________________
United States District Court
Eastern District of Virginia

DSMDB-3099953