I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 771

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. Proffer of Evidence Related to Laches (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 PX 176, # 10 PX 408, # 11 PX 409, # 12 PX 410, # 13 PX 411, # 14 PX 412, # 15 PX 413, # 16 PX 414, # 17 PX 415, # 18 PX 416, # 19 PX 417 I, # 20 PX 417 II, # 21 PX 418, # 22 PX 419 I, # 23 PX 419 II, # 24 PX 421, # 25 DX 21, # 26 DX28, # 27 DX 255)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
Exhibit C 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 3 NORFOLK DIVISION 4 -------------------------x I/P ENGINE, INC., 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512 7 GOOGLE INC., et al., 8 9 Defendants. -------------------------x 10 11 CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 13 Videotaped Deposition of DONALD M. KOSAK 14 Washington, D.C. 15 Thursday, May 31, 2012 16 9:04 a.m. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Reported by: Amy E. Sikora, RPR, CRR, CSR-NY, CLR 23 24 25 Job No. CS397174 Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 16 1 Q. Sure. 2 A. Google AdSense is what I had heard 3 about. 4 product names that are both advertising, I got 5 them confused. 6 7 The -- the two terms are -- you know, the Q. I'm sorry. All right. Well, with respect to Google AdSense, you knew about it by 2005? 8 A. Right. 9 Q. And that was because you used it at 10 Lycos? 11 A. Right, right. 12 Q. Did you have an understanding of how 13 14 Google AdSense worked? A. I don't know how it worked internally. 15 We knew enough to put the required tags on the 16 page to call those ads, but what happens after 17 that, I don't know. 18 19 Q. selected? 20 21 MS. ALBERT: Q. 22 23 Did you have any idea how ads were In Google AdSense? MR. BILSKER: Q. Objection, vague. Let me withdraw that. Did you have any idea how ads were 24 selected in Google AdSense in the 2005 time 25 frame? Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 17 1 A. No. 2 Q. Did you do anything to try to 3 determine how ads were selected in the 2005 time 4 frame in Google AdSense? 5 A. No. 6 Q. Is there a reason that you didn't do 7 anything to try to identify how they were 8 selected? 9 A. Yes. 10 Q. What was that reason? 11 A. There was no business reason for me to 12 spend time on analy -- analyzing something that 13 was, you know, wasn't a revenue stream for us. 14 Why -- why would I analyze it? 15 16 17 Q. At that time in 2005, who owned the two patents that are part of this case? A. In 2005, I'm not sure the ownership. 18 I -- I believe it was probably Dom Communications 19 Corporation. 20 Q. Not Lycos? 21 A. Well, Lycos was owned by Dom 22 Communication Corporation at the time. Hence, my 23 uncertainty about the ownership, whether they 24 were owned by a subdivision or the parent company 25 or -- I don't know exactly who had the ownership Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?