I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 9

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 1 Complaint, by AOL, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Noona, Stephen)

Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

Civil Action No. 2:11cv512 (RAJ-FBS)

AOL INC., GOOGLE, INC.,
IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC.,
GANNETT CO., INC. and
TARGET CORPORATION
Defendants.

[PROPOSED] AGREED ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR AOL INC.
TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO COMPLAINT
On this day came defendant AOL Inc. (“AOL”), by counsel, upon the Motion for
Extension of Time for AOL Inc. to File Responsive Pleadings to Complaint (“Motion for
Extension of Time”), and, upon consideration of the arguments set forth in the Motion for
Extension of Time, and for good cause shown, it is
ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time filed by AOL is granted, and AOL
shall have through and including November 14, 2011, in which to answer, plead or otherwise
respond to the Complaint filed by the plaintiff in this action.
Dated: October _____, 2011

Entered:

_____/_____/_____

______________________________
Raymond A. Jackson, District
JudgeUnited States District Court
Eastern District of Virginia

WE ASK FOR THIS:

/s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
Kaufman & Canoles, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for AOL Inc.

SEEN AND AGREED:

/s/ Kenneth W. Brothers
Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Kenneth W. Brothers
Dickstein Shapiro LLP
1825 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc.

11329939_1.DOC