I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 978

MOTION for Order to Show Cause UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512
)
AOL, INC. et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)

[PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE’S MOTION
FOR DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE UNDER RULE 37
FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER

THIS MATTER COMES to the Court on Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Motion to Show
Cause. Upon consideration thereof, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. This Court finds the alleged changes to AdWords are not colorably different than the
adjudged infringing systems; or
2. This Court orders Defendants to produce all relevant custodial documents, in native
format, within 3 days and that I/P Engine shall have an additional 10 days to comply
with each deadline in this Court’s August 13, 2013 order, while Defendants shall
have no such extension of time;
3. This Court orders one deposition of a Google witness in addition to the witnesses
provided in this Court’s August 13, 2013 Order. Google shall also produce a person
knowledgeable about the existence and location of the documents described in the
August 13 Order upon 3 days notice of such deposition by I/P Engine;

4. This Court orders that I/P Engine shall have an additional 7 hours to depose the
original three Google witnesses;
5. This Court orders that the produced source code be placed on a single, non-networked
computer that is password protected and maintained in a secure, locked area in
accordance with the Protective Order in the D.C. offices of counsel for I/P Engine;
and
6. This Court awards I/P Engine all fees and costs associated with this motion including
I/P Engine’s fees and costs associated with conferring with Google regarding this
issue.

ENTERED this ______ day of

2013:

United States District Court Judge

2

WE ASK FOR THIS:

By: /s/ Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Donald C. Schultz (Virginia Bar No. 30531)
W. Ryan Snow (Virginia Bar No. 47423)
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC
150 West Main Street
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222)
Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
Kenneth W. Brothers
Charles J. Monterio, Jr.
Jonathan Falkler
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Dawn Rudenko Albert
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1633 Broadway
New York, NY 10019
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.

SEEN AND __________________________:

____________________________________
Stephen E. Noona, VSB No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510

3

David Bilsker
David Perlson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Robert L. Burns
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Two Freedom Square
11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190
Cortney S. Alexander
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3500 SunTrust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 94111
Counsel for Defendants AOL, Inc., Google, Inc.,
IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc.
and Target Corporation

4