Corbin Bernsen v. Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 24683013190.6), filed by Crobin Bernsen. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Receipt, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ecav, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (NORFOLK DIVISION) LERK USDIS1HICIOUURT nnFOl K VA CORBIN BERNSEN, Plaintiff Case No. "■ INNOVATIVE LEGAL MARKETING, LLC 4854 Haygood Rd., Suite 101 Virginia Beach, VA 23455, ) ) Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Corbin Bernsen, for his Complaint against Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC ("Innovative") alleges as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Corbin Bernsen is a citizen of the State of California and resides in Los Angeles County, California. 2. Defendant Innovative Legal Marketing, LLC ("Innovative") is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business at 4854 Haygood Rd., Suite 101, Virginia Beach, Virginia. UTmsmrTlON AND VENUE 3 This Court has original jurisdiction over this case or controversy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because this action is between citizens of different States and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. 4 This Court has persona, jurisdiction over .nnovative pursuant to V, Cot* AN*. 5 and has an interest in, uses, or possesses re*, property in this Commonwea.th. 5 Venue is proper in this judicia. district under 28 U.S.C. . 1391 because Innovative resides in this judicial district and a substantial part of the even, or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this judicial district. r.FNFRAL ai I gr.ATIONS 6. Corbin Bernsen is an actor, producer, and director who is well known for his portrayal of "Arnie Becker" on the popular television series "L.A. Law." 7. Innovative is engaged in the business of providing marketing services for lawyers and law frms, including advertising campaigns with television commercials, radio advertisements, interne, ads, billboards, newspaper advertisements, direct mail, and other print media and marketing materials. 8. On October 8,2009, Bernsen and Innovative entered into a Spokesperson Agreement rAgreement"), pursuant to which Bernsen granted Innovative rights to use his likeness, image, and/or voice as the spokesperson for a media campaign and promotion for .nnovative and its clients as se. forth in the Agreement. A copy of the Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 9. The Agreement required Bernsen to, among other things, record promotional announcements, make promotional appearances, and be available for stil, photography sessions. Bemsen was obligated to make himself available for a. leas. 30 full production days each year for filming, photographing, and voicing the various media components of the campaign. ,0. to exchange for BetWs services, Innovative agreed to pay Bernsen $.,000,000 over a 5-year period. The payments were divided into an initial $50,000 payment a, the beginning of each year, followed by eleven equal monthly payments of $.3,636.36, for a to,, of $200,000 per year. 11. Bemsen fully performed all his obligations under the Agreement. ,2. From approximately November, 2009 through June 16, 2011, Innovative made the required payments to Bemsen under the Agreement. In total, Innovative made $331,818.12 in payments to Bernsen. 13. In or about early June, 2011, Brien Johnson, the Managing Director of Innovative, orally notified Bemsen that Innovative was terminating the Agreement. 14. At the time he orally terminated the Agreement, Johnson told Bernsen that the sole reason Innovative was terminating the Agreement and cancelling the campaign was because i, was not successful, except in the state of New York, where Innovative would continue » run television commercials. Innovative has ceased making the payments due Bemsen under the Agreement. 15. Innovative has continued to air television commercials featuring Bernsen as recently as September 12, 2011, Innovative' website continues to feature photographs and voice recorded messages of Bernsen, and video clips of the commercials continue to be available to the public on the Internet as recently as September 20,2011. 16. As a result of Innovative's breach of the Agreement, Bernsen has incurred substantial damages in an amount no less than $668,181.88. 17. All conditions precedent to the maintenance of this action have been performed, satisfied, or otherwise discharged. COUNT I: OF CONTRACT 18. This is an action by Bernsen against Innovative for breach of the Agreement as alleged above. 19. Bernsen incorporates and realleges the allegations in paragraphs 1-17 as if fully set forth herein. 20. The Agreement between Bernsen and Innovative is a valid and enforceable contract. 21. Bernsen fully performed his obligations under the Agreement. 22. Innovative materially breached the Agreement by wrongfully terminating the Agreement and refusing to make any further payments to Bemsen. 23. As a direct result of Innovative's breach of the Agreement, Bemsen has incurred substantial damages in an amount no less than $668,181.88. Wherefore, Plaintiff CORBIN BERNSEN demands judgment against Defendant INNOVATIVE LEGAL MARKETING, LLC for: A. Compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial, but for an amount not less than $668,181.88; B. Incidental and consequential damages in an amount to be determined at trial; C. Pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate; D. Attorneys' fees and costs; and E. Such further relief as the Court deems just and proper. COUNT II: 24. This is an action by Bemsen against Innovative for unjust enrichment as alleged 25. Bernsen incorporates and realleges the allegations in paragraphs 1-17 as if fully above. set forth herein. 26. Bernsen conferred a benefit on Innovative by providing the services alleged 27. After Innovative terminated the Agreement, it continued to use Bernsen's above. HKeness, image, and/or voice as the spokesperson for its media campaign and promotion without compensation to Bernsen. 28. Innovative's continued receipt of the benefits from Bernsen's services without compensation therefore constitutes unjust enrichment. Wherefore, Plaintiff CORBIN BERNSEN demands judgment against Defendant INNOVATIVE LEGAL MARKETING, LLC for: A. Compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial, but for an amount not less than $668,181.88; B. Incidental and consequential damages in an amount to be determined at trial; C. Pre-judgment interest and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate; and D. Such further relief as the Court deems just and proper. itor JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b), Bemsen demands a trial by jury of all issues triable of right by a jury. Dated: October 7,2011 Respectfully submitted, y^vougJ Bifdridge, VSB No. 5^, idbaldridge@venable.com . Lauren E Ingebritson (not admitted in Virginia) leingebritson@venable.com VENABLE LLP 575 Seventh Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 202-344-4000 (telephone) 202-344-8300 (facsimile) Counsel for Plaintiff Corbin Bermen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?