Tobey v. Napolitano et al
Filing
46
STIPULATION re 43 MOTION for Extension of Time To Move for Joinder of Additional Party Defendants by Capital Region Airport Commission, Terri Jones, Jeffrey Kandler, Anthony Mason, Janet Napolitano, John S. Pistole, Rebecca Smith, Aaron Tobey, Quentin Trice, Calvin Vann, Victor Williams. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Jones, Belinda)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
AARON TOBEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:11cv154
JANET NAPOLITANO,
JOHN S. PISTOLE,
CAPITAL REGION AIRPORT
COMMISSION, VICTOR WILLIAMS,
JOHN SMITH, CALVIN VANN AND
JOHN DOES #1 AND #2
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO MOVE FOR JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTY DEFENDANTS
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time to Move for Joinder
of Additional Party Defendants (Doc # 43) with reference to modification of a provision of the
Scheduling Order issued by the Court on July 5, 2011 (Doc #37).and the Parties’ Stipulation for
Extension of Time to Move for Joinder of Additional Party Defendants. Based on the Parties’
Stipulation, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be permitted to
move this Court for joinder of additional party defendants in accordance with F.R.C.P 15(a) up
to ten (10) days after his counsel learns the identity of any persons not previously identified by
the defendants who may be properly named as a defendant(s), but not later than twenty (20)
days prior to the discovery cutoff. It is further ORDERED that any motion to join additional
parties made after the ten (10) day limit or later than twenty (20) days prior to the discovery
cutoff will be entertained by the Court only upon a showing of good cause.
The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________
United States District Judge
Henry E. Hudson
Richmond, Virginia
Dated:_______________, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?