Perry v. Judd et al

Filing 89

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Pat Mullins. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sims, Charles)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division THE HONORABLE RICK PERRY, § § Plaintiff, § § NEWT GINGRICH, JON HUNTSMAN, § JR., and RICK SANTORUM § § Intervenor-Plaintiffs § § v. § § CHARLES JUDD, KIMBERLY § BOWERS, and DON PALMER, members § of the Virginia Board of Elections, in their § official capacities, and PAT MULLINS, § in his official capacity as Chairman of the § Republican Party of Virginia, § § Defendants. § Civil No. 3:11-CV-856 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Patrick Mullins’, in his capacity as Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia (“Chairman” or “Chairman Mullins”) Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings is GRANTED. The Court finds that sufficient cause has been shown for an extension. Having considered Chairman Mullins’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings, it is hereby ORDERED that Chairman Mullins’ Responsive Pleadings are due on February 9, 2012. DONE AND ORDERED this ___ day of __________, 2012. _________________________________ The Honorable John A. Gibney, Jr. WE ASK FOR THIS: /s/ Charles M. Sims Charles E. Sims (Va. Bar 35845) LeClairRyan, a Professional Corporation Riverfront Plaza, East Tower 951 East Byrd Street, Eighth Floor Richmond, Virginia 23219 Telephone: (804) 343-5091 Facsimile: (804) 783-7655 Charles.Sims@leclairryan.com Lee E. Goodman (Va. Bar 31695) LeClairRyan, a Professional Corporation 1101 Connecticut Ave., NW, Sixth Floor Washington, DC 20036 (202) 659-6730 (Tel.) (202) 775-6430 (Fax) Lee.Goodman@leclairryan.com Attorneys for Patrick Mullins, Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?