Pasco v. Zimmerman et al
Filing
16
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, 11 Brief / Memorandum in Support, 4 MOTION to Dismiss, 9 Brief / Memorandum in Support, 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, 13 Brief / Memorandum in Support, 5 Brief / Memorandum in Support by Robert L. Pasco. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Roanoke Division
ROBERT L. PASCO,
Plaintiff,
v.
HANK ZIMMERMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 5:11CV00087
ORDER
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on the 27th day of December, 2011 on the Consent
Motion to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to and oppose Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss. It appearing that the Motion is for good cause, is consented to by the parties, and
should be granted;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have through and including
January 17, 2012 within which to file his response and opposition to the Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss.
ENTERED this ____ day of _____________________, 201__.
_____________________________
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?