Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 65

MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative for Clarification of the Pleading which is Subject to Plaintiff's Motion by Impulse Marketing Group Inc. (Attachments: # 1)(Ivey, Floyd)

Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Doc. 65

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 65

Filed 09/08/2005

1

Floyd E. Ivey Liebler, Ivey & Connor, P.S. 3 1141 N. Edison, Suite C P.O. Box 6125 4 Kennewick, WA 99336 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative for Clarification of the Pleading which is Subject to Plaintiff's Motion - 1.
LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 [phone]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) Pl a i n t i f f s ) ) vs. ) ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) a Nevada Corporation, ) ) Defendants ) ___________________________________ ) IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, ) III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA ) GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and ) EMILY ABBEY, ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, NO. CV-04-5125-FVS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE PLEADING WHICH IS SUBJECT TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

Defendant Impulse Marketing Group, Inc. filed on September 6, 2005 its First Amended Answer, Amended Counterclaims and Amended Third-Party Complaint. Plaintiff's Motion To Dismiss Counterclaims and Third Party Defendants under FRCP 12(b)(6) or in the Alternative for Summary Judegment under FRCP

Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DEfednant' otionStrikeorForClarification\Defendant.Motion.Clarify. sM Argument.PlaintiffsMotionDismiss.050908.wpd

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 65

Filed 09/08/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

56 or in the Alternative to Dismiss Under FRCP 9(b)(hereafter Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss) remains, pertaining to the original Defendant's Answer, Counterclaims and Third Party Complaint, and is now rescheduled for October 12, 2005. Defendant moves to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and in the alternative for clarification of the pleading which is the subject of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. This Motion is based on the Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative for Clarification of Which Pleading is the Subject of Plaintiff's Mo t i o n . DATED this 8th day of September, 2005. LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE By /s/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY, WSBA #6888 Local Counsel for Defendant

I hereby certify that on September 8, 2005, I electronically filed Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and in the 17 Alternative for Clarification of the Pleading Which is Subject to Plaintiff's Motion with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send 18 notification of such filing to Douglas E. McKinley, Jr. and transmitted via internet to Peter Glantz.
16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss and in the Alternative for Clarification of the Pleading which is Subject to Plaintiff's Motion - 2.
LIEBLER, IVEY, CONNOR, BERRY & ST. HILAIRE Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 6125 Kennewick, Washington 99336-0125 [phone]

S/ FLOYD E. IVEY FLOYD E. IVEY

Z:\IPClient\ImpulseMarketingGroup v. Gordon\Pleadings\Plaintiff Motion for S u m m a r y Judgment\DEfednant' otionStrikeorForClarification\Defendant.Motion.Clarify. sM Argument.PlaintiffsMotionDismiss.050908.wpd