Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Filing 83

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE NOTICE : Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for 11/4/2005 09:00 AM before Judge Fred Van Sickle. (CORRECTED PDF attached) (Attachments: # 1 Consent)(CP, Courtroom Deputy)

Gordon v. Impulse Marketing Group Inc

Doc. 83

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 83

Filed 09/15/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

JAMES S. GORDON, JR., an individual residing in Benton County, Washington, Plaintiffs, vs. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Defendants. IMPULSE MARKETING GROUP, INC., Third Party Plaintiff, vs. BONNIE GORDON, JAMES S. GORDON, III, JONATHAN GORDON, JAMILA GORDON, ROBERT PRITCHETT and EMILY ABBEY, Third-Party Defendants. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:

No. 04-CV-5125-FVS NOTICE SETTING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

A telephonic Scheduling/Status Conference will be held on 11/4/05 at 9:00 a.m. The plaintiff shall initiate the call to Judge

Van Sickle at [phone] and to all other parties. On or before 10/28/05 the parties shall file the following: 1. Consent Form. The parties shall complete the enclosed

Consent Form or advise the Clerk of the Court that there will be no consent that this case may be tried by a United States Magistrate Judge. NOTICE See, 28 U.S.C. § 636 as amended; and

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 83

Filed 09/15/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

2.

Proposed Discovery Plan.

The parties shall file a Proposed

Discovery Plan as discussed in FRCP 26(f) that includes the disclosures required under Rule 26(a)(1); and 3. Statement Identifying Corporate Information: Any non-

governmental corporate party to this action shall file a statement identifying all its parent corporations and listing any publicly held company that owns 10% or more of the party's stock. Counsel have an

on-going responsibility to supplement this information. 4. Joint Status Certificate The parties shall file a Joint If a joint

Status Certificate outlining the issues set forth below.

certificate cannot be completed, the parties shall file separate certificates; and Counsel shall confer at least 14 days in advance of the settlement status conference with respect to the following issues. a. b. c. d. Are there any issues regarding service of process? Are there any issues regarding jurisdiction or venue? What motions are anticipated? When can discovery be completed? Dispositive motions The trial will be

will be due seven days after the discovery cutoff.

set approximately 120 days after the discovery cutoff. e. Are any special procedures needed, such as

consolidation of actions for discovery or pretrial, reference to a special master, a magistrate, arbitration, or to the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation, or application for Manual for Complex Litigation? f. NOTICE Are any modifications to the standard pretrial

Case 2:04-cv-05125-FVS

Document 83

Filed 09/15/2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

procedures needed because of simplicity or complexity of this case? g. Should this case be bifurcated? Or are there other

issues regarding the structuring sequence of the trial? h. What are the prospects for settlement? Will there be a

point before the discovery cutoff when the parties can conduct meaningful settlement discussions or participate in a form of alternative dispute resolution? I. Are there any other matters to discuss that may insure

the effective resolution of this case? DATED this 14th day of September, 2005. JAMES R. LARSEN DISTRICT COURT EXECUTIVE s/Cindy K. Parks Cindy K. Parks Deputy Clerk To: Floyd E. Ivey Douglas E McKinley, Jr.

NOTICE