United States of America v. Impulse Media Group Inc
Filing
45
MOTION for Relief Request Regarding Attendance at Court Ordered Settlement by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)Noting Date 10/22/2007.(Hash, Lauren)
United States of America v. Impulse Media Group Inc
Doc. 45 Att. 1
Case 2:05-cv-01285-RSL
Document 45-2
Filed 10/11/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________ UNITED STATES JUDGE Presented by: Dated this _____ day of __________, 2007. The Court hereby grants the United States' request that the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") be excused from the requirement of LR 39.1(c)(4)(E) that parties having authority to settle the case must attend mediation. It is ORDERED that the requirement of LR 39.1(c)(4)(E) will be fulfilled by the attendance of Charles Harwood, Federal Trade Commission Regional Director for the Northwest Region, at the October 25, 2007, mediation in United States v. Impulse Media Group. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IMPULSE MEDIA GROUP, INC., a Washington corporation, Defendant.
No. CV05-1285L
PROPOSED ORDER
Jeffrey I. Steger s/ Jeffrey I. Steger
PROPOSED ORDER ON UNITED STATES' REQUEST REGARDING ATTENDANCE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CV05-1285L Department of Justice P.O. Box 386 Washington, DC 20044 (202) 307-0047
-1-
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-01285-RSL
Document 45-2
Filed 10/11/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trial Attorney Department of Justice Office of Consumer Litigation P.O. Box 386 Washington, D.C. 20044 Tel: (202) 307-0047 Fax: (202) 514-8742 Jeffrey.steger@usdoj.gov
PROPOSED ORDER ON UNITED STATES' REQUEST REGARDING ATTENDANCE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CV05-1285L
-2-
Department of Justice P.O. Box 386 Washington, DC 20044 (202) 307-0047
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?