Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al

Filing 8

MOTION to Dismiss For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) by Defendants Virtumundo Inc, Adknowledge Inc, Scott Lynn. Noting Date 4/7/2006. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Newman, Derek)

Download PDF
Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al Doc. 8 Att. 1 Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 8-2 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. VIRTUMUNDO, INC, a Delaware corporation d/b/a ADNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; ADKNOWLEDGE, INC., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a ADKNOWLEDGEMAIL.COM; SCOTT LYNN, an individual; and JOHN DOES, 1-X, Defendants. The Honorable John C. Coughenour UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married individual, d/b/a `GORDONWORKS.COM', Plaintiff, No. CV06-0204JCC ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(2) THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jursdiction of Defendants Virtumundo, Inc., Adknowledge, Inc., and Scott Lynn (collectively "Defendants"). Having reviewed the Complaint, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and the Declarations of Michael Geroe and Allen Brandt in support thereof, Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, and Defendants' Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, the Court finds and rules as follows: DEFS.' MOT. TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION - 1 (CV06-0204JCC) NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP 505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 274-2800 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00204-JCC Document 8-2 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. Plaintiff fails to allege any basis for the assertion of personal jurisdiction over Defendant Virtumundo, Inc. Defendant Virtumundo, Inc. did not purposefully avail itself of this forum and lacked sufficient contacts with the State of Washington to be subject to jurisdiction in this State; 2. Plaintiff fails to allege any basis for the assertion of personal jurisdiction over Defendant Adknowledge, Inc. Defendant Adknowledge, Inc. did not purposefully avail itself of this forum and lacked sufficient contacts with the State of Washington to be subject to jurisdiction in this State; 3. Plaintiff fails to allege any basis for the assertion of personal jurisdiction over Defendant Scott Lynn. Defendant Scott Lynn did not purposefully avail himself of this forum and lacked sufficient contacts with the State of Washington to be subject to jurisdiction in this State; 4. 5. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's The Court further ORDERS Defendants are entitled to their Complaint is dismissed with prejudice; and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in defending this lawsuit pursuant to RCW 4.28.185(5). Defendants are directed to file an attorney's fees declaration with respect thereto and Plaintiff may respond within 7 calendar days of said filing. It is HEREBY ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants. DATED this ____________________. _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEFS.' MOT. TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION - 2 (CV06-0204JCC) NEWMAN & NEWMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, LLP 505 Fifth Ave. S., Ste. 610 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 274-2800

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?