Kim v. Coach, Inc, et al

Filing 40

MOTION to Seal Defendants' Motion to Strike Class Allegations and Declarations of John Macaluso and Nancy Axilrod by Defendants Coach Services Inc, Coach, Inc., Counter Claimant Coach, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 4/22/2011, (Keehnel, Stellman)

Download PDF
THE HONORABLE RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 GINA KIM, on behalf of a class consisting of herself and all other persons similarly situated, 12 13 14 15 v. COACH, INC., a Maryland corporation, and COACH SERVICES, INC., a Maryland corporation, 16 19 20 21 22 25 NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: APRIL 22, 2011 Pursuant to Local Rule 5(g), defendants Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Coach Companies”) hereby respectfully make this request to have the following documents, filed herewith, filed under seal: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Class Allegations (the “Motion to Strike”); 2. Declaration of John Macaluso (and attached exhibits) in Support of Defendants’ 23 24 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS AND DECLARATIONS OF JOHN MACALUSO AND NANCY AXILROD Defendants, and, as to Coach, Inc., counterclaim plaintiff. 17 18 Plaintiffs, and as to Ms. Kim, counterclaim defendant, NO. 2:11-cv-00214-RSM Motion to Strike (the “Macaluso Declaration”); 3. Declaration of Nancy Axilrod in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Strike (the “Axilrod Declaration”). 26 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS AND DECLARATIONS – 1 NO. 2:11-cv-00214-RSM DLA Piper LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104-7044 ● Tel: 206.839.4800 1 The Macaluso and Axilrod Declarations are filed in connection with the Court’s consideration 2 of Defendants’ Motion to Strike the class allegations from the Second Amended Complaint 3 filed by plaintiff Gina Kim (Dkt. No. 20-1). See Declaration of Patrick Eagan in Support of 4 Coach Companies’ Motion to Seal Motion to Strike Class Allegations and Declarations of John 5 Macaluso and Nancy Axilrod (“Eagan Dec.”) ¶ 2. 6 There are sufficient and compelling reasons to permit the filing of the Motion to Strike 7 and the Macaluso and Axilrod Declarations under seal. Local Rule 5(g)(1) provides for filing 8 under seal where “the public’s right of access is outweighed by the interests of the public and 9 the parties in protecting files, records, or other documents from public review.” Sealing 10 documents in the Court record is appropriate where the documents contain confidential or 11 sensitive business information. See Omax Corp. v. Flow Intern. Corp., No. C04-2334RSL, 12 2007 WL 3232540, *1 (W.D. Wash., Oct. 31, 2007) (sealing certain documents relating to 13 businesses’ “long-term strategic plans, proprietary software, control methodology and cutting 14 models, and/or customer and competitor research,” where “disclosure . . . would put [parties] at 15 a competitive disadvantage”). 16 The Motion to Strike and Macaluso and Axilrod Declarations contain highly 17 confidential business information concerning how Coach Companies identify counterfeit 18 products, the public disclosure of which would enable counterfeiters to evade detection and 19 which would harm Coach Companies’ business. See Eagan Dec. ¶¶ 3-5; Macaluso Dec. ¶ 1; 20 Axilrod Dec. ¶ 1. Online sales of counterfeit products are a major problem for intellectual 21 property holders such as Coach. Eagan Dec. ¶¶ 3-5; Macaluso Dec. ¶ 3; Axilrod Dec. ¶ 3. 22 Online sales of counterfeit products also injure the general public, who believe that they are 23 obtaining high-quality merchandise and instead receive poor-quality knockoffs. The Motion to 24 Strike and the Macaluso and Axilrod Declarations contain information concerning Coach 25 Companies’ efforts to monitor and enforce Coach Companies’ intellectual property rights on 26 the internet. Eagan Dec. ¶¶ 3-5. Coach Companies do not seek to file their entire Motion to DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS AND DECLARATIONS – 2 NO. 2:11-cv-00214-RSM DLA Piper LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104-7044 ● Tel: 206.839.4800 1 Strike and the Macaluso and Axilrod Declarations under seal. Rather, as soon as possible after 2 consulting with opposing counsel regarding the acceptability of proposed redactions, Coach 3 Companies will file redacted versions of the Motion to Strike and Macaluso and Axilrod 4 Declarations, which documents will be accessible to the public. 5 Companies respectfully request that the Court grant the motion and permit Coach Companies to 6 file the Motion to Strike and Macaluso and Axilrod Declarations under seal. Accordingly, Coach 7 8 9 Dated this 14th day of April, 2011. DLA Piper LLP (US) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 By: s/ Stellman Keehnel Stellman Keehnel, WSBA No. 9309 R. Omar Riojas, WSBA No. 35400 Patrick Eagan, WSBA No. 42679 DLA Piper LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: 206.839.4800 Fax: 206.839.4801 E-mail: stellman.keehnel@dlapiper.com E-mail: omar.riojas@dlapiper.com E-mail: patrick.eagan@dlapiper.com Attorneys for defendant and counterclaim plaintiff Coach, Inc., and defendant Coach Services, Inc. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS AND DECLARATIONS – 3 NO. 2:11-cv-00214-RSM DLA Piper LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104-7044 ● Tel: 206.839.4800 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on April 14, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with the 3 Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all 4 counsel of record. 5 Dated this 14th day of April, 2011. 6 /s/ Stellman Keehnel Stellman Keehnel, WSBA No. 9309 7 8 9 WEST\223350251.1 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS AND DECLARATIONS – 4 NO. 2:11-cv-00214-RSM DLA Piper LLP (US) 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7000 Seattle, WA 98104-7044 ● Tel: 206.839.4800

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?