Microsoft Corporation v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
Filing
42
REPLY, filed by Defendants Foxconn Electronics, Inc., Foxconn International Holdings Ltd., Foxconn Precision Component Co., Ltd., Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., TO RESPONSE to 34 MOTION to Stay (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Stewart, Douglas)
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
v.
BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC, HON HAI
PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.,
FOXCONN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS
LTD., FOXCONN ELECTRONICS, INC.,
FOXCONN PRECISION COMPONENT
(SHENZHEN) CO. LTD., and INVENTEC
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civ. Act. 2:11-cv-00485
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY
CO., LTD., FOXCONN
INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS
LTD., FOXCONN ELECTRONICS,
INC., AND FOXCONN PRECISION
COMPONENT (SHEN ZHEN) CO.,
LTD.’S MOTION TO STAY
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Hon Hai, Foxconn Int.,
Foxconn Elec. Inc., & Foxconn Precision
Component (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd.’s Motion to Stay
(2:11-cv-00485 RAJ)
1
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Columbia Center
701 Fifth Avenue Suite 6100
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 903-8800
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion of Defendants Hon Hai Precision
3
Industry Co., Ltd., Foxconn International Holdings Ltd., Foxconn Electronics, Inc., and Foxconn
4
Precision Component (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd. (the “Foxconn Defendants”) (Dkt. No. 34) to Stay
5
Plaintiff’s claims against the Foxconn Defendants pending final resolution of United States
6
International Trade Commission Investigation No. 337-TA-769. Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation
7
(“Microsoft”) does not oppose the granting of a stay, but has requested that Microsoft’s obligation
8
to serve process be tolled for the duration of the stay, and that Microsoft be granted a reasonable
9
amount of time after the lifting of the stay to effect such service. Upon consideration of the
10
Motion and for good cause shown, it is hereby:
11
ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (Dkt. No. 34) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the claims
12
against the Foxconn Defendants, and any obligation to serve process on the Foxconn Defendants,
13
are stayed in their entirety until the International Trade Commission’s determination in ITC
14
Investigation No. 337-TA-769 becomes final. Upon the lifting of the stay, Microsoft shall have 60
15
days to effect service of process upon the Foxconn Defendants.
16
17
18
DATED: ___________________
________________________________
HON. RICHARD A. JONES
United States District Judge
\\\\
19
20
\\\\
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Hon Hai, Foxconn Int.,
Foxconn Elec. Inc., & Foxconn Precision
Component (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd.’s Motion to Stay
(2:11-cv-00485 RAJ)
2
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Columbia Center
701 Fifth Avenue Suite 6100
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 903-8800
1
Presented by
2
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
3
/s/ _ Douglas F. Stewart
Douglas Stewart, WSBA #34068
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
701 Fifth Avenue Suite 6100
Seattle, WA 98104
Tel: (206) 903-8800
Fax: (206) 903-8820
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
Admitted pro hac vice
Glenn E. Westreich
Steven M. Levitan
Inchan A. Kwon
2033 Gateway Place, Suite 300
San Jose, CA 95110
Tel: (408) 660-4120
Fax: (408) 660-4121
Attorneys for Defendants,
FOXCONN ELECTRONICS, INC.,
FOXCONN PRECISION COMPONENTS
(SHEN ZHEN) CO., LTD., FOXCONN
INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD., AND
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO.,
LTD.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Hon Hai, Foxconn Int.,
Foxconn Elec. Inc., & Foxconn Precision
Component (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd.’s Motion to Stay
(2:11-cv-00485 RAJ)
3
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Columbia Center
701 Fifth Avenue Suite 6100
Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 903-8800
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?