Wicken v. Colvin
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by Andrew John Wicken, 15 Stipulated MOTION TO REMAND filed by Carolyn W. Colvin. Noting Date 7/25/2013. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (Attachments: # 1 RR Proposed Order, # 2 RR Proposed Judgment)(SI)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
ANDREW JOHN WICKEN,
Case No. C13-262-TSZ-JPD
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
12
13
14
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
15
16
Plaintiff brought this action to seek judicial review of the denial of his application for
17
disability benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Dkt. 1. The
18
parties have stipulated that this case should be reversed and remanded for further administrative
19
proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Dkt. 15.
20
Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court recommends that this case be
21
REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the
22
Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) shall: 1) further evaluate the claimant’s disability claim; 2)
23
evaluate the claimant’s credibility pursuant to Social Security Ruling 96-7p; 3) reconsider the
24
medical opinion evidence in accordance with SSRs 96-2p, 96-6p and 06-3p; and 4) further
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAGE - 1
1
evaluate the claimant’s residual functional capacity pursuant to Social Security Ruling 96-8p. As
2
warranted, the ALJ may obtain vocational expert evidence to clarify the effect of the assessed
3
limitations on the claimant’s occupational base.
4
A proposed order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.
5
DATED this 25th day of July, 2013.
A
6
JAMES P. DONOHUE
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?