Waste Action Project v. Buckley Recycle Center Inc

Filing 143

CONSENT DECREE by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(RS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BUCKLEY RECYCLE CENTER, INC., ) RONALD SHEAR, RONDA STERLEY, ) and JEFFREY SPENCER, ) ) Defendants. ___________________________________ ) WASTE ACTION PROJECT, I. 17 No. C13-01184 RSM CONSENT DECREE STIPULATIONS Plaintiff Waste Action Project sent sixty day notices of intent to sue to defendants Buckley 18 19 Recycle Center Inc. and Ronald Shear, alleging violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 20 1251 et seq., relating to discharges of pollutants and fill material at Buckley Recycle Center, 21 Inc.’s operations on the property of defendant Jeffrey Spencer in unincorporated King County 22 near Auburn, Washington, and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, civil penalties, and 23 attorneys’ fees and costs. Waste Action Project sent sixty day notices of intent to sue to Buckley Recycle Center 24 25 Inc., Ronald Shear, Ronda Sterley, and Jeffrey Spencer, (“Defendants” collectively) alleging 26 violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act’s open dumping prohibition, 42 U.SC. CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -1 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 1 2 § 6945, relating to operations on the subject property, and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, civil penalties, and attorneys’ fees and costs. 3 The Defendants answered and denied the allegations of plaintiff Waste Action Project. 4 5 6 7 On December 7, 2016, the Court entered an order granting Waste Action Project’s Third Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. On January 6, 2017, Buckley Recycle Center, Inc. (“BRC”), Ronald Shear, and Ronda Sterley (the “BRC Defendants”) appealed the Court’s December 7, 2016 order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 8 9 10 11 12 13 BRC Defendants have closed on the acquisition of a new site for BRC’s operations and have entered into a pre-application process with King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (“DDES”) for the necessary permits to construct and operate a replacement facility on the new site. The precise date DDES will issue BRC the final Occupancy Permit for BRC’s new site is currently unknown and therefore referred to herein as the “Occupancy Date.” 14 15 16 17 Waste Action Project and Defendants agree that settlement of these matters is in the best interest of the parties and the public, and that entry of this Consent Decree is the most appropriate means of resolving this action, including BRC Defendants’ appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, without any admission of liability of the Defendants. 18 19 20 Waste Action Project and Defendants stipulate to the entry of this Consent Decree without trial or adjudication of any issues of fact or law regarding Waste Action Project’s claims or allegations set forth in its First Amended and Supplemental Complaint and its sixty-day notices. 21 22 23 Dated this ___17th March __, 2017 Buckley Recycle Center, Inc. Dated this _10th of March_________, 2017 Waste Action Project By_/s/ Ronda Sterley Ronda Sterley Title: By/s/ Greg Wingard Greg Wingard Title: Executive Director 24 25 26 CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -2 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 1 Dated this __17th March ___, 2017 Dated this __3/13/17___, 2017 ___/s/ Ronald Shear___________ Ronald Shear __/s/ Lee Spencer____________ Estate of Jeffrey Spencer 2 3 4 5 Dated this _______________, 2017 6 7 _______________________________ Ronda Sterley 8 II. ORDER AND DECREE 9 THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the foregoing Stipulations of the parties. 10 11 12 Having considered the Stipulations and the promises set forth below, the Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES as follows: 13 1. This court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action. 14 2. Each signatory for the parties certifies for that party that she or he is authorized to 15 enter into the agreements set forth below. 16 3. This Consent Decree applies to and binds the parties and their successors and 17 assigns. 18 4. 19 This Consent Decree applies to the operation, oversight, or both by Defendants of 20 the property located at 28225 West Valley Highway North, Auburn, Washington, 98002 (the 21 “BRC Site” or the “Spencer Property”). The parties acknowledge that defendant Jeffrey Spencer 22 passed away in January of 2015 and that the Spencer Estate is now the party owning the Spencer 23 Property. 24 5. This Consent Decree is a full and complete settlement of the claims alleged in the 25 26 First Amended and Supplemental Complaint and all other claims known and unknown existing as CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -3 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 1 of the date of entry of this Consent Decree, that could be asserted under the Clean Water Act, 33 2 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387, or the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.SC. §§ 6901-6992, 3 4 arising from operations at the BRC Site. These claims are released and dismissed with prejudice. Enforcement of this decree is Waste Action Project’s exclusive remedy for any violation of its 5 6 7 8 terms. With this Consent Decree, each party releases the other parties and the Estate of Jeffrey Spencer, from all claims of any sort arising from this lawsuit, with the exception of enforcement of this decree as provided for herein. 9 10 11 6. Defendants enter into this Consent Decree for the purposes of settlement of disputed claims, to avoid the expenses and uncertainty of litigation. Defendants admit no liability to any of the claims or allegations of Plaintiff. 12 7. Defendants agree to the following terms and conditions in full and complete 13 14 satisfaction of the claims covered by this decree: a. 15 BRC Defendants have removed all materials, including the berm, and all 16 equipment, from the westernmost twenty-five feet along the west property line of the 17 Spencer Property (hereinafter, the “West Buffer Area”); 18 b. 19 BRC Defendants will vacate operations in and removed all materials and equipment from the northwest quarter (approximately 2.5 acres) of the Spencer Property 20 (hereinafter the “Northwest Quarter”) by September 30, 2017. 21 c. 22 BRC Defendants will employ their best efforts to submit a complete and 23 adequate application as soon as possible to DDES for the necessary permits to construct 24 and operate a replacement facility on a new site, and will otherwise employ their best 25 efforts to obtain the final Occupancy Permit for BRC’s new site. The date on which King 26 County issues a final Occupancy Permit for BRC’s new site and on which that site is CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -4 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 1 legally available for full use for BRC’s business shall be referred to herein as the 2 “Occupancy Date”. 3 d. 4 BRC Defendants will vacate operations in and remove all materials and equipment from the remainder of the Spencer Property (approximately 7.5 acres) as 5 follows: one acre every six months following the Occupancy Date. 6 e. 7 By the time BRC Defendants are required to vacate the last acre of the 8 Spencer Property they will vacate the entire Spencer Property and remove all materials 9 and equipment from the Spencer Property, including all berm materials, and all wheel 10 wash materials and equipment, including wheel wash piping and pavement, provided that 11 in the eastern third of the Spencer Property, the BRC defendants shall leave the property 12 in a condition suitable for residential use, which shall include existing driveways and 13 graveled areas, but excluding the wheel wash, as suitable and acceptable to the Spencer 14 Estate. 15 f. 16 For any area which the BRC Defendants vacate in the western two thirds of 17 the Spencer Property, BRC Defendants will, upon vacating that area, till and plant a mix 18 of native plant species (“Habitat Seed Mix” defined as eight parts blue wildrye (Elumus 19 glacus), four parts slough sedge (Carex obnupta), and two parts each soft rush (Juncus 20 effusus), slender rush (Juncus tenuis), tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa), and 21 western mannagrass (Glyceria occidentalis)) at a density of twenty pounds of seed per 22 23 acre evenly distributed throughout the area, with the goal of returning the western two 24 thirds of the property to a tillable condition, provided that BRC Defendants need not plant 25 Habitat Seed Mix in areas where the owner of the Spencer Property has begun row 26 cropping. CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -5 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 g. 1 2 BRC Defendants will aerate any significant water storage that results on vacated property as a result of the berm locations. 3 h. 4 The BRC Defendants will notify Waste Action Project and the Estate of Jeffrey Spencer (Attn: Lee Spencer) in writing of their completion of each of the tasks 5 listed in subparagraphs (a) through (f) of this paragraph seven. 6 i. 7 Within seven (7) days of a written request to enter the Spencer Property, 8 Defendants will permit Waste Action Project to enter the Spencer Property and allow 9 reasonable access for Waste Action Project to verify completion of any of the tasks listed 10 in subparagraphs (a) through (g) of this paragraph seven. 11 j. The BRC Defendants will forward copies of all written communications 12 between the BRC Defendants and the Washington Department of Ecology and/or King 13 County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review related to the Spencer 14 15 Property to Waste Action Project and (if desired) to the Estate of Jeffrey Spencer (Attn: 16 Lee Spencer) within seven days of the communication. This obligation will continue 17 through the termination date of this Consent Decree. 18 8. 19 In fulfillment of a term of the parties’ settlement and in exchange for consideration, on or about October 15, 2015, the BRC Defendants did collectively pay $500.00 to 20 the Green River Community College Foundation for environmental benefit projects in the Green 21 22 River watershed described in Attachment A to this Consent Decree. Payment was made by check 23 payable Green River Community College Foundation and delivered to George Frasier, 12401 SE 24 320th St., Auburn WA 98092-3622. 25 26 9. The BRC Defendants will pay Waste Action Project’s reasonable litigation fees and costs in the amount of $193,783.53. This payment is full and complete satisfaction of any CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -6 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 1 claims Waste Action Project may have under the Clean Water Act or the Resource Conservation 2 and Recovery Act for fees and costs. Payments as set forth herein will be made by certified bank 3 4 check(s) payable and mailed via certified mail to Smith & Lowney, PLLC, 2317 East John St., Seattle, WA 98112, attn: Richard A. Smith. The BRC Defendants will make payments as 5 6 follows: a. 7 8 this Consent Decree; 9 10 $133,783.53 within ten (10) days of the date of Court approval and execution of b. $10,000 per month beginning forty (40) days from the date of Court approval and execution of this Consent Decree and continuing until payment has been made in full. 11 10. The Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter and allow this case to be 12 reopened without filing fee for the purpose of enabling the parties to apply to the Court for any 13 14 further order that may be necessary to construe, carry out, enforce compliance and/or resolve any 15 substantive dispute regarding the terms or conditions of this Consent Decree until termination of 16 the Consent Decree per paragraph 13. 17 18 19 11. For any future claims that Waste Action Project may assert against BRC related to any property other than the BRC Site, WAP will agree to submit the dispute to mediation before instituting any legal action against BRC. 20 12. The parties recognize that, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(3), no consent 21 22 judgment can be entered in a Clean Water Act suit in which the United States is not a party prior 23 to 45 days following the receipt of a copy of the proposed consent judgment by the U.S. Attorney 24 General and the Administrator of the U.S. EPA. Therefore, upon the signing of this Consent 25 Decree by the parties, Waste Action Project will serve copies of it upon the Administrator of the 26 U.S. EPA and the Attorney General. CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -7 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 13. 1 2 This Consent Decree takes effect upon entry by the Court. It terminates upon completion of the tasks identified in paragraphs seven and nine of this Consent Decree. 3 14. 15. This Consent Decree may be modified only upon the approval of the Court. 16. 4 All parties have participated in drafting this decree. If for any reason the court should decline to approve this Consent Decree in the 5 6 7 form presented, this Consent Decree is voidable at the discretion of any party. The parties agree 8 to continue negotiations in good faith in an attempt to cure any objection raised by the Court to 9 entry of this Consent Decree. 10 11 17. Notifications required by this Consent Decree must be in writing. The sending party may use any of the following methods of delivery: (1) personal delivery; (2) registered or 12 certified mail, in each case return receipt requested and postage prepaid; (3) a nationally 13 14 recognized overnight courier, with all fees prepaid; or (4) e-mail. For a notice or other 15 communication regarding this decree to be valid, it must be delivered to the receiving party at the 16 addresses listed below or to any other address designated by the receiving party in a notice in 17 accordance with this paragraph seventeen. 18 if to Waste Action Project: 19 Waste Action Project P.O. Box 4832 Seattle, WA 98194 email: gwingard@earthlink.net 20 21 22 23 and to: 24 Smith & Lowney PLLC 2317 East John St. Seattle, WA 98112 email: clairet@igc.org 25 26 CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -8 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 if to Defendant(s): 1 2 Buckley Recycling Center P.O.Box 1373 Enumclaw, WA 98022 3 4 and to: 5 8 Justin D. Park Romero Park P.S. 155 108th Ave. NE, Suite #202 Bellevue, WA 98004 email: jpark@romeropark.com and sprendergast@romeropark.com 9 and to: 6 7 Lee Spencer Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeff Spencer 6710 S 267th Auburn WA 98001 10 11 12 and to: 13 15 Robert E. West, Jr. West Law Offices, PS 332 1st St NE Auburn, WA 98002 16 A notice or other communication regarding this Consent Decree will be effective when 14 17 18 received unless the notice or other communication is received after 5:00 p.m. on a business day, or on a day that is not a business day, in which case the notice will be deemed received at 9:00 19 20 21 a.m. on the next business day. A notice or other communication will be deemed to have been received: (a) if it is delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail or by nationally 22 recognized overnight courier, upon receipt as indicated by the date on the signed receipt; or (b) if 23 the receiving party rejects or otherwise refuses to accept it, or if it cannot be delivered because of 24 a change in address for which no notice was given, then upon that rejection, refusal, or inability to 25 deliver; or (c) for notice provided via e-mail, upon receipt of a confirming response or a "read 26 CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM -9 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883 1 receipt" from the party receiving notice. 2 SO ORDERED this 11th day of May 2017. 3 A 4 RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CONSENT DECREE: No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM - 10 Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c. 2317 East John St. Seattle, Washington 98112 (206) 860-2883

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?