Waste Action Project v. Buckley Recycle Center Inc
Filing
143
CONSENT DECREE by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(RS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
BUCKLEY RECYCLE CENTER, INC.,
)
RONALD SHEAR, RONDA STERLEY,
)
and JEFFREY SPENCER,
)
)
Defendants.
___________________________________ )
WASTE ACTION PROJECT,
I.
17
No. C13-01184 RSM
CONSENT DECREE
STIPULATIONS
Plaintiff Waste Action Project sent sixty day notices of intent to sue to defendants Buckley
18
19
Recycle Center Inc. and Ronald Shear, alleging violations of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §
20
1251 et seq., relating to discharges of pollutants and fill material at Buckley Recycle Center,
21
Inc.’s operations on the property of defendant Jeffrey Spencer in unincorporated King County
22
near Auburn, Washington, and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, civil penalties, and
23
attorneys’ fees and costs.
Waste Action Project sent sixty day notices of intent to sue to Buckley Recycle Center
24
25
Inc., Ronald Shear, Ronda Sterley, and Jeffrey Spencer, (“Defendants” collectively) alleging
26
violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act’s open dumping prohibition, 42 U.SC.
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-1
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
1
2
§ 6945, relating to operations on the subject property, and seeking declaratory and injunctive
relief, civil penalties, and attorneys’ fees and costs.
3
The Defendants answered and denied the allegations of plaintiff Waste Action Project.
4
5
6
7
On December 7, 2016, the Court entered an order granting Waste Action Project’s Third
Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. On January 6, 2017, Buckley Recycle Center, Inc.
(“BRC”), Ronald Shear, and Ronda Sterley (the “BRC Defendants”) appealed the Court’s
December 7, 2016 order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
8
9
10
11
12
13
BRC Defendants have closed on the acquisition of a new site for BRC’s operations and
have entered into a pre-application process with King County Department of Development and
Environmental Services (“DDES”) for the necessary permits to construct and operate a
replacement facility on the new site. The precise date DDES will issue BRC the final Occupancy
Permit for BRC’s new site is currently unknown and therefore referred to herein as the
“Occupancy Date.”
14
15
16
17
Waste Action Project and Defendants agree that settlement of these matters is in the best
interest of the parties and the public, and that entry of this Consent Decree is the most appropriate
means of resolving this action, including BRC Defendants’ appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals, without any admission of liability of the Defendants.
18
19
20
Waste Action Project and Defendants stipulate to the entry of this Consent Decree without
trial or adjudication of any issues of fact or law regarding Waste Action Project’s claims or
allegations set forth in its First Amended and Supplemental Complaint and its sixty-day notices.
21
22
23
Dated this ___17th March __, 2017
Buckley Recycle Center, Inc.
Dated this _10th of March_________, 2017
Waste Action Project
By_/s/ Ronda Sterley
Ronda Sterley
Title:
By/s/ Greg Wingard
Greg Wingard
Title: Executive Director
24
25
26
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-2
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
1
Dated this __17th March ___, 2017
Dated this __3/13/17___, 2017
___/s/ Ronald Shear___________
Ronald Shear
__/s/ Lee Spencer____________
Estate of Jeffrey Spencer
2
3
4
5
Dated this _______________, 2017
6
7
_______________________________
Ronda Sterley
8
II.
ORDER AND DECREE
9
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the foregoing Stipulations of the parties.
10
11
12
Having considered the Stipulations and the promises set forth below, the Court hereby ORDERS,
ADJUDGES, and DECREES as follows:
13
1.
This court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this action.
14
2.
Each signatory for the parties certifies for that party that she or he is authorized to
15
enter into the agreements set forth below.
16
3.
This Consent Decree applies to and binds the parties and their successors and
17
assigns.
18
4.
19
This Consent Decree applies to the operation, oversight, or both by Defendants of
20
the property located at 28225 West Valley Highway North, Auburn, Washington, 98002 (the
21
“BRC Site” or the “Spencer Property”). The parties acknowledge that defendant Jeffrey Spencer
22
passed away in January of 2015 and that the Spencer Estate is now the party owning the Spencer
23
Property.
24
5.
This Consent Decree is a full and complete settlement of the claims alleged in the
25
26
First Amended and Supplemental Complaint and all other claims known and unknown existing as
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-3
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
1
of the date of entry of this Consent Decree, that could be asserted under the Clean Water Act, 33
2
U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387, or the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.SC. §§ 6901-6992,
3
4
arising from operations at the BRC Site. These claims are released and dismissed with prejudice.
Enforcement of this decree is Waste Action Project’s exclusive remedy for any violation of its
5
6
7
8
terms. With this Consent Decree, each party releases the other parties and the Estate of Jeffrey
Spencer, from all claims of any sort arising from this lawsuit, with the exception of enforcement
of this decree as provided for herein.
9
10
11
6.
Defendants enter into this Consent Decree for the purposes of settlement of
disputed claims, to avoid the expenses and uncertainty of litigation. Defendants admit no liability
to any of the claims or allegations of Plaintiff.
12
7.
Defendants agree to the following terms and conditions in full and complete
13
14
satisfaction of the claims covered by this decree:
a.
15
BRC Defendants have removed all materials, including the berm, and all
16
equipment, from the westernmost twenty-five feet along the west property line of the
17
Spencer Property (hereinafter, the “West Buffer Area”);
18
b.
19
BRC Defendants will vacate operations in and removed all materials and
equipment from the northwest quarter (approximately 2.5 acres) of the Spencer Property
20
(hereinafter the “Northwest Quarter”) by September 30, 2017.
21
c.
22
BRC Defendants will employ their best efforts to submit a complete and
23
adequate application as soon as possible to DDES for the necessary permits to construct
24
and operate a replacement facility on a new site, and will otherwise employ their best
25
efforts to obtain the final Occupancy Permit for BRC’s new site. The date on which King
26
County issues a final Occupancy Permit for BRC’s new site and on which that site is
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-4
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
1
legally available for full use for BRC’s business shall be referred to herein as the
2
“Occupancy Date”.
3
d.
4
BRC Defendants will vacate operations in and remove all materials and
equipment from the remainder of the Spencer Property (approximately 7.5 acres) as
5
follows: one acre every six months following the Occupancy Date.
6
e.
7
By the time BRC Defendants are required to vacate the last acre of the
8
Spencer Property they will vacate the entire Spencer Property and remove all materials
9
and equipment from the Spencer Property, including all berm materials, and all wheel
10
wash materials and equipment, including wheel wash piping and pavement, provided that
11
in the eastern third of the Spencer Property, the BRC defendants shall leave the property
12
in a condition suitable for residential use, which shall include existing driveways and
13
graveled areas, but excluding the wheel wash, as suitable and acceptable to the Spencer
14
Estate.
15
f.
16
For any area which the BRC Defendants vacate in the western two thirds of
17
the Spencer Property, BRC Defendants will, upon vacating that area, till and plant a mix
18
of native plant species (“Habitat Seed Mix” defined as eight parts blue wildrye (Elumus
19
glacus), four parts slough sedge (Carex obnupta), and two parts each soft rush (Juncus
20
effusus), slender rush (Juncus tenuis), tufted hairgrass (Deschampsia caespitosa), and
21
western mannagrass (Glyceria occidentalis)) at a density of twenty pounds of seed per
22
23
acre evenly distributed throughout the area, with the goal of returning the western two
24
thirds of the property to a tillable condition, provided that BRC Defendants need not plant
25
Habitat Seed Mix in areas where the owner of the Spencer Property has begun row
26
cropping.
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-5
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
g.
1
2
BRC Defendants will aerate any significant water storage that results on
vacated property as a result of the berm locations.
3
h.
4
The BRC Defendants will notify Waste Action Project and the Estate of
Jeffrey Spencer (Attn: Lee Spencer) in writing of their completion of each of the tasks
5
listed in subparagraphs (a) through (f) of this paragraph seven.
6
i.
7
Within seven (7) days of a written request to enter the Spencer Property,
8
Defendants will permit Waste Action Project to enter the Spencer Property and allow
9
reasonable access for Waste Action Project to verify completion of any of the tasks listed
10
in subparagraphs (a) through (g) of this paragraph seven.
11
j.
The BRC Defendants will forward copies of all written communications
12
between the BRC Defendants and the Washington Department of Ecology and/or King
13
County Department of Permitting and Environmental Review related to the Spencer
14
15
Property to Waste Action Project and (if desired) to the Estate of Jeffrey Spencer (Attn:
16
Lee Spencer) within seven days of the communication. This obligation will continue
17
through the termination date of this Consent Decree.
18
8.
19
In fulfillment of a term of the parties’ settlement and in exchange for
consideration, on or about October 15, 2015, the BRC Defendants did collectively pay $500.00 to
20
the Green River Community College Foundation for environmental benefit projects in the Green
21
22
River watershed described in Attachment A to this Consent Decree. Payment was made by check
23
payable Green River Community College Foundation and delivered to George Frasier, 12401 SE
24
320th St., Auburn WA 98092-3622.
25
26
9.
The BRC Defendants will pay Waste Action Project’s reasonable litigation fees
and costs in the amount of $193,783.53. This payment is full and complete satisfaction of any
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-6
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
1
claims Waste Action Project may have under the Clean Water Act or the Resource Conservation
2
and Recovery Act for fees and costs. Payments as set forth herein will be made by certified bank
3
4
check(s) payable and mailed via certified mail to Smith & Lowney, PLLC, 2317 East John St.,
Seattle, WA 98112, attn: Richard A. Smith. The BRC Defendants will make payments as
5
6
follows:
a.
7
8
this Consent Decree;
9
10
$133,783.53 within ten (10) days of the date of Court approval and execution of
b.
$10,000 per month beginning forty (40) days from the date of Court approval and
execution of this Consent Decree and continuing until payment has been made in full.
11
10.
The Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter and allow this case to be
12
reopened without filing fee for the purpose of enabling the parties to apply to the Court for any
13
14
further order that may be necessary to construe, carry out, enforce compliance and/or resolve any
15
substantive dispute regarding the terms or conditions of this Consent Decree until termination of
16
the Consent Decree per paragraph 13.
17
18
19
11.
For any future claims that Waste Action Project may assert against BRC related to
any property other than the BRC Site, WAP will agree to submit the dispute to mediation before
instituting any legal action against BRC.
20
12.
The parties recognize that, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(3), no consent
21
22
judgment can be entered in a Clean Water Act suit in which the United States is not a party prior
23
to 45 days following the receipt of a copy of the proposed consent judgment by the U.S. Attorney
24
General and the Administrator of the U.S. EPA. Therefore, upon the signing of this Consent
25
Decree by the parties, Waste Action Project will serve copies of it upon the Administrator of the
26
U.S. EPA and the Attorney General.
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-7
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
13.
1
2
This Consent Decree takes effect upon entry by the Court. It terminates upon
completion of the tasks identified in paragraphs seven and nine of this Consent Decree.
3
14.
15.
This Consent Decree may be modified only upon the approval of the Court.
16.
4
All parties have participated in drafting this decree.
If for any reason the court should decline to approve this Consent Decree in the
5
6
7
form presented, this Consent Decree is voidable at the discretion of any party. The parties agree
8
to continue negotiations in good faith in an attempt to cure any objection raised by the Court to
9
entry of this Consent Decree.
10
11
17.
Notifications required by this Consent Decree must be in writing. The sending
party may use any of the following methods of delivery: (1) personal delivery; (2) registered or
12
certified mail, in each case return receipt requested and postage prepaid; (3) a nationally
13
14
recognized overnight courier, with all fees prepaid; or (4) e-mail. For a notice or other
15
communication regarding this decree to be valid, it must be delivered to the receiving party at the
16
addresses listed below or to any other address designated by the receiving party in a notice in
17
accordance with this paragraph seventeen.
18
if to Waste Action Project:
19
Waste Action Project
P.O. Box 4832
Seattle, WA 98194
email: gwingard@earthlink.net
20
21
22
23
and to:
24
Smith & Lowney PLLC
2317 East John St.
Seattle, WA 98112
email: clairet@igc.org
25
26
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-8
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
if to Defendant(s):
1
2
Buckley Recycling Center
P.O.Box 1373
Enumclaw, WA 98022
3
4
and to:
5
8
Justin D. Park
Romero Park P.S.
155 108th Ave. NE, Suite #202
Bellevue, WA 98004
email: jpark@romeropark.com and sprendergast@romeropark.com
9
and to:
6
7
Lee Spencer
Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeff Spencer
6710 S 267th
Auburn WA 98001
10
11
12
and to:
13
15
Robert E. West, Jr.
West Law Offices, PS
332 1st St NE
Auburn, WA 98002
16
A notice or other communication regarding this Consent Decree will be effective when
14
17
18
received unless the notice or other communication is received after 5:00 p.m. on a business day,
or on a day that is not a business day, in which case the notice will be deemed received at 9:00
19
20
21
a.m. on the next business day. A notice or other communication will be deemed to have been
received: (a) if it is delivered in person or sent by registered or certified mail or by nationally
22
recognized overnight courier, upon receipt as indicated by the date on the signed receipt; or (b) if
23
the receiving party rejects or otherwise refuses to accept it, or if it cannot be delivered because of
24
a change in address for which no notice was given, then upon that rejection, refusal, or inability to
25
deliver; or (c) for notice provided via e-mail, upon receipt of a confirming response or a "read
26
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
-9
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
1
receipt" from the party receiving notice.
2
SO ORDERED this 11th day of May 2017.
3
A
4
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CONSENT DECREE:
No. 2:13-CV-01184RSM
- 10
Smith & Lowney, p.l.l.c.
2317 East John St.
Seattle, Washington 98112
(206) 860-2883
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?