Morales Morales v. Johnson et al
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Noting Date 10/20/2014, by Hon. James P. Donohue. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed judgment)(MD)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
GUSTAVO MORALES MORALES,
NO. C14-1064-MJP-JPD
9
10
11
Petitioner,
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
v.
JEH JOHNSON, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
Petitioner Gustavo Morales Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, was previously
15
detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the Northwest Detention Center
16
under a reinstated order of removal. See Dkt. 1. Through counsel, petitioner filed the instant
17
habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking a bond hearing or release from
18
detention. Id.
19
On October 15, 2014, an Immigration Judge granted petitioner release on bond, and the
20
Department of Homeland Security waived appeal. Dkt. 15. On October 17, 2014, the parties
21
filed a joint stipulation of dismissal. Id. The parties stipulate that petitioner’s request for a bond
22
hearing is moot and petitioner withdraws his alternate request for release. Id. The parties further
23
stipulate that each shall bear their own costs and fees. Id.
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1
1
Based on the parties’ stipulation, the Court recommends entering an Order (1) granting
2
the parties’ joint stipulation, Dkt. 15; (2) denying as moot respondents’ motion to dismiss, Dkt.
3
9; and (3) voluntarily dismissing this matter without prejudice and without costs or fees to either
4
party. A proposed Order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.
5
6
7
The Clerk should note the matter for October 20, 2014, as ready for the Honorable
Marsha J. Pechman’s consideration.
DATED this 20th day of October, 2014.
A
8
9
JAMES P. DONOHUE
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?