Morales Morales v. Johnson et al

Filing 16

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Noting Date 10/20/2014, by Hon. James P. Donohue. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed judgment)(MD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 GUSTAVO MORALES MORALES, NO. C14-1064-MJP-JPD 9 10 11 Petitioner, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. JEH JOHNSON, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 Petitioner Gustavo Morales Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, was previously 15 detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the Northwest Detention Center 16 under a reinstated order of removal. See Dkt. 1. Through counsel, petitioner filed the instant 17 habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking a bond hearing or release from 18 detention. Id. 19 On October 15, 2014, an Immigration Judge granted petitioner release on bond, and the 20 Department of Homeland Security waived appeal. Dkt. 15. On October 17, 2014, the parties 21 filed a joint stipulation of dismissal. Id. The parties stipulate that petitioner’s request for a bond 22 hearing is moot and petitioner withdraws his alternate request for release. Id. The parties further 23 stipulate that each shall bear their own costs and fees. Id. 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1 1 Based on the parties’ stipulation, the Court recommends entering an Order (1) granting 2 the parties’ joint stipulation, Dkt. 15; (2) denying as moot respondents’ motion to dismiss, Dkt. 3 9; and (3) voluntarily dismissing this matter without prejudice and without costs or fees to either 4 party. A proposed Order accompanies this Report and Recommendation. 5 6 7 The Clerk should note the matter for October 20, 2014, as ready for the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman’s consideration. DATED this 20th day of October, 2014. A 8 9 JAMES P. DONOHUE United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?