State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al
Filing
18
AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) All Defendants, filed by State of Washington. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit)(Purcell, Noah)
First Amended Complaint
Exhibit 10
Case 1:17-cv-10154-NMG Document 23-1 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 1
United States Department of State
Deputy Assistant Secretcuy
for Visa Services
Washington, D. C. 20520
January 27, 2017
Upon request of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and pursuant to
sections 212(±) and 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and 22 CFR
41.122 and 42.82, and in implementation of'section 3(c) of the Executive Order on
Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals, I hereby
provisionally revoke all valid nonimmigrant and immigrant visas of nationals of
Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, subject to the exceptions
discussed below.
'
The revocation does not apply to visas in the following nonimmigrant
classifications: A-1, A-2, G-1, G-2, G-3, G-4, NATO, C-2, or certain diplomatic
visas.
The revocation also does not apply to any visa exempted on the basis of a
determination made by the Secretaries of State and Homeland Secmity pursuant to
section 3(g) of the Executive Order on a case-by-case basis, and when in the
national interest.
This document is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the
United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or
agents, or any other person.
~~a:
=-----Edward J. Ramotowski
Deputy Assistant Secretary
Bureau of Consular Affairs
Department of State
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?