State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al

Filing 202

NOTICE of Lodging Additional Declarations re 198 Amended Complaint, ; filed by Plaintiffs Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Maryland, State of New York, State of Oregon, State of Washington. (Attachments: # 1 Updated Imdex of Declarations in Support of Third Amended Complaint, # 2 Decl of Negin Ingbrigtsen, # 3 2nd Decl of Sadaf Amin, # 4 Decl of Janet Billups, # 5 Decl of Janet Camp, # 6 Decl of Susan Capalbo, # 7 2nd Decl of Margaret Everett, # 8 Decl of Anke Schennink, # 9 2nd Decl of Lovely A. Warren, # 10 Decl of Wim Wiewel, # 11 Decl of Lydia Wood, # 12 Decl of Joseph E. Fahey, # 13 2nd Decl of Aaron O. Lavine, # 14 2nd Decl of Eric Scherzer, # 15 3rd Decl of Eric Scherzer)(Melody, Colleen)

Download PDF
DECLARATION OF LYDIA WOOD 1 The Honorable James L. Robart 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 10 STATE OF WASHINGTON; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF 11 MARYLAND; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF 12 NEW YORK; and STATE OF OREGON, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 DONALD TRUMP, in his official 16 capacity as President of the United States; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 17 HOMELAND SECURITY; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as 18 Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; REX W. 19 TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and the UNITED 20 STATES OF AMERICA, 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-00141-JLR DECLARATION OF LYDIA WOOD 6. UAW 4123 is aware of at least one Academic Student Employee who is a citizen or national of one of the eight countries named in the September 24 order and is a single entry visa holders. One Academic Student Employee has plans to travel outside of the U.S. to attend an academic conference; inability to travel to the conference may impact the studies, work, and future career of this member.UAW Local 4123 is aware of at least one member, who is an Iranian national, and a graduate student, as well as a Teaching Assistant, who altered her travel plans because of the ban and herUniversity's advice that all international students not travel. As a result of the Executive Order, she is living in an uncertain and stressful situation.UAW 4123 is aware of other members who are unable to visit close family members or friends outside of the U.S. or are significantly concerned that family who are nationals of the eight countries would not be able to obtain visas to visit them in the U.S. UAW 4123 is aware of other members who seek future employment in the U.S. but whose job prospects are now limited and ability to secure future work tenuous because of employers' fears that the Academic Student Employee will not be permitted to remain in the country. 7. On February 27, 2017, UAW 2865, along with otherUAW local unions representing scholars and academic workers, made the following statement, signed by thousands ofUAW members: We call on our,Federal and State representatives to reject any attempts to ban or limit opportunities for international students and scholars to work in the United States. Instead, we must preserve and expand important programs­ including Optional Practical Training, J�l, H�lB, and the permanent residency process-that foster the inclusion of people who come to share their talent, ideas, and expertise from across the globe. Innovation, discovery, and research do not stop at national borders. Neither can the rights and opportunities of students and scholars who make major contributions to world�class research and teaching at U.S. universities. Their work before and after graduation plays an essential role in driving leadership in innovation technology and scholarship, breakthrough cures to our most threatening diseases, and efforts to address urgent issues like climate change. 8. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed on this 10th day of October, 2017 Lydia Wood �/hi�

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?