Witt v. Department of the Air Force et al
Filing
176
MOTION FOR BILL OF COSTS by Plaintiff Margaret Witt. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Costs) Noting Date 10/29/2010, (Kung, Sher)
Witt v. Department of the Air Force et al
Doc. 176 Att. 1
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 25 24 26 25 27 26 28 27 29 28 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PL MOT. FOR COSTS (Case No. 06-5195) - 1
HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN WASHINGTON AT TACOMA DIVISION MAJOR MARGARET WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; ET AL., Defendants. No. C06-5195 RBL [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COSTS
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion For Costs. Upon review of all arguments submitted by the parties, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion For Costs and TAXES costs against Defendants on behalf of Plaintiff in the amount of $17,294.02. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ______ day of October, 2010. _______________________________ William M. McCool CLERK OF COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ACLU OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
901 Fifth Avenue, Suite 630 Seattle, Washington 98164 (206) 624-2184
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 11 12 12 13 13 14 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 21 21 22 22 23 23 24 25 24 26 25 27 26 28 27 29 28 1
Presented By: By: __/s/ Sher S. Kung __________ Sarah A. Dunne, WSBA# 34869 Sher S. Kung, WSBA #42077 ACLU OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION 901 Fifth Avenue #630 Seattle, WA 98164 Tel: (206) 624-2184 dunne@aclu-wa.org skung@aclu-wa.org James Lobsenz, WSBA#8787 CARNEY BADLEY SPELLMAN 701 5th Ave Ste 3600Seattle, WA 98104-7010 Tel. (206) 622-8020 lobsenz@carneylaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff
A
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PL MOT. FOR COSTS (Case No. 06-5195) - 2 CLU OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION 901 Fifth Avenue, Suite 630 Seattle, Washington 98164 (206) 624-2184
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?