Witt v. Department of the Air Force et al
Filing
181
Civil Appeals Docketing Statement by Defendants Department of the Air Force, Donald H Rumsfeld, Mary L Walker, Michael W Wynne, to be transmitted by Clerk to Circuit Court of Appeals. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit)(Phipps, Peter)
Witt v. Department of the Air Force et al
Doc. 181 Att. 1
Case 3:06-cv-05195-RBL Document 166
Filed 09/24/10 Page 1 of 1
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) (Mod. 10/93) Judgment in a Civil Case "
United States District Court
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
MAJOR MARGARET WITT,
v.
CASE NUMBER UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; et al, [%]
CV06-5195 RBL
Decision by Court. This action came to trial before the Court. The issues have been presented and a decision has been rendered. BASED ON ORAL AND WRITTEN MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW THE COURT HAS ORDERED THAT The application of "Dont's Ask Don't Tell" to Major Margaret Witt does not significantly further the government's interest in promoting military readiness, unit morale and cohesion. Her discharge from the Air Force Reserves violated her substantive due process rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. She should be restored to her position as a Flight Nurse with the 446th AES as soon as is practicable, subject to meeting applicable regulations touching upon qualifications necessary for continued service.
Dated:
September 24, 2010
WILLIAM M. McCOOL Clerk s/Jean Boring (By) Deputy Clerk
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?