Searls v. Grays Harbor County et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against defendant(s) All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-2538421), filed by Marcus R Searls. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rousso, Lee)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY, THE CITY OF ) OAKVILLE, THE CITY OF ELMA, STEVE ) ) LARSON, and RICHARD FLETCHER, ) ) Defendants. ) MARCUS SEARLS, Cause No. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 1983 JURY DEMAND 16 Plaintiff Marcus Searls, by and through his counsel of record, Lee H. Rousso, alleges as 17 18 follows by way of a Complaint For Damages Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: PARTIES 19 20 21 22 23 1.1 Plaintiff Marcus Searls (“Searls”) is a natural person residing in Elma, Grays Harbor County, Washington. Searls is a resident of the Western District of Washington. 1.2 Defendant Grays Harbor County is a government entity duly formed under Title 36 of the 24 Revised Code of Washington. Upon information and belief, Grays Harbor County provides law 25 26 enforcement services under contract to the City of Oakville. Grays Harbor County sits in the 27 Western District of Washington. 28 COMPLAINT- 1 THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 (425)457-3314(c) (425)988-1841(f) 1 1.3 Defendant City of Oakville is a government entity duly formed under Title 35 of the 2 Revised Code of Washington. Upon information and belief, the City of Oakville does not have 3 its own police department and contracts with Grays Harbor County for law enforcement services. 4 The City of Oakville sits in the Western District of Washington. 5 6 1.4 7 Code of Washington. The City of Elma sits in the Western District of Washington. 8 1.5 Defendant City of Elma is a government entity duly formed under Title 35 of the Revised Defendant Steve Larson ( “Larson”) is a Grays Harbor County Sheriff’s Deputy. Upon 9 10 11 12 information and belief, Steve Larson resides in the Western District of Washington. 1.6 Defendant Richard Fletcher (“Fletcher”) is a Lieutenant with the Elma Police Department. Upon information and belief, Richard Fletcher resides in the Western District of 13 14 Washington. 15 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 16 17 18 19 2.1 This Court has original jurisdiction over the claims made herein under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as these claims present a federal question. 2.2 Venue is proper in the Western District of Washington under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) and 20 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) as all defendants reside in the District and the actions giving rise to these 21 22 claims occurred in the District. 23 24 III. FACTS 3.1 Plaintiff Searls resides in Elma, Washington. 3.2 From time to time, Searls places ads on the Craigslist website (www.craigslist.org) 25 26 27 seeking sexual partners, both men and women. 28 COMPLAINT- 2 THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 (425)457-3314(c) (425)988-1841(f) 1 3.3 In January, 2011, Grays Harbor County Sheriff’s Deputy Steve Larson answered one of 2 Searls’ Craigslist ads. The two men met on or about January 18, 2011, in Grays Harbor County 3 and had consensual sex. 4 3.4 Deputy Larson’s regular patrol area included the City of Oakville. 3.5 At this first meeting, Searls informed Larson that he planned on opening a medical 5 6 7 marijuana dispensary in the City of Oakville. Larson responded by telling Searls that he could 8 have Searls arrested and put in jail if he opened a dispensary. Searls believed that Larson could 9 in fact cause Searls to be arrested. 10 3.6 Searls also informed Larson that he did not want to have an ongoing relationship with 11 12 him and did not want to meet again for sex. Larson responded by informing Searls that that the 13 choice was not his to make, and that Searls would have to continue to provide sexual favors to 14 Larson if he wanted to be in the dispensary business. 15 3.7 On or about February 8, 2011, Searls opened a medical marijuana dispensary, Free World 16 Enterprises, at 304 East Pine in the City of Oakville. When Searls opened the dispensary, it 17 18 appeared that Washington would soon legalize marijuana dispensaries, although the enabling 19 legislation, SB 5073, was eventually vetoed in most parts by Governor Gregoire. 20 3.8 21 at Searls’ residence in Elma. This usually consisted of a patrol car or cars parking across the 22 After the dispensary opened, the Elma Police Department instituted regular surveillance street from Searls’ residence for hours at a time. 23 24 3.9 Within days of the dispensary’s opening, Larson renewed his demands for sex from 25 Searls. Searls attempted to reject these demands, but Larson told Searls repeatedly that he could 26 “put him in jail.” 27 28 COMPLAINT- 3 THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 (425)457-3314(c) (425)988-1841(f) 1 3.10 On approximately fifteen occasions between February 8, 2011 and June 18, 2011, Larson 2 obtained sex from Searls under threat of arrest. 3 3.11 4 when Larson was on duty with the Grays Harbor County Sheriff’s Office. On at least one 5 On at least two occasions the nonconsensual sex between Larson and Searls occurred occasion, Larson and Searls had sex on the hood of Larson’s Grays Harbor Sheriff’s Office 6 7 patrol car. On this occasion the sex was violent, as Larson pushed Searls’ face into the hood of 8 the car with such force that it broke one of Searls’ teeth. 9 3.12 10 Larson usually transported Searls to remote wooded areas in Grays Harbor County for their nonconsensual sexual encounters. He also occasionally transported Searls to motels, 11 12 including motels in Tacoma and in Portland, Oregon. 13 3.13 As Searls tried to terminate the sexual relationship with Larson, Larson intensified his 14 pursuit. Larson often parked his Grays Harbor County Sheriff’s Office patrol car across the 15 street from Free World Enterprises so that he could be in proximity to Searls. Searls found this 16 stalking behavior to be very intimidating and frightening. 17 18 3.14 On one occasion, Larson, in uniform, entered the dispensary during business hours and 19 demanded that Searls close the shop so that Larson could transport him to another location for 20 the purpose of having sex. Searls refused to do this and Larson became very angry, but 21 eventually agreed to leave the store. 22 3.15 On about June 1, 2011, Searls announced that he would be closing Free World 23 24 Enterprises in response to a letter that he had received from the Grays Harbor County Sheriff. 25 Searls was surprised to receive the letter, as Larson had continually assured him that the Sheriff’s 26 Office would not take any action. 27 28 COMPLAINT- 4 THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 (425)457-3314(c) (425)988-1841(f) 1 3.16 However, while Searls had announced that the dispensary would be closed, he in fact 2 continued to operate under what he believed was the protection of Larson. With the dispensary 3 now underground, Larson had the leverage to step up his “sex or jail” demands. As the days 4 passed, Searls became increasingly fearful for his safety. Searls knew he could not continue to 5 have sex with Larson, but he also believed that Larson might turn violent if he rejected him. 6 In order to escape Larson’s pursuit, Searls closed the dispensary for good on about June 7 3.17 8 18, 2011, and drove to Tumwater, Washington, where he checked into the Motel 6 at 400 Lee 9 Street. However, when Larson persisted with text messages and telephone calls, Searls revealed 10 his location. Larson informed Searls that he would be driving to Tumwater immediately. 11 12 3.18 As Larson approached the Motel 6, Searls became increasingly fearful that Larson would 13 commit an act of violence if Searls refused to have sex with him. Fearing for his life, Searls fled 14 on foot and hid in a wooded area for hours. 15 3.19 Larson continues to stalk Searls and has been seen doing so as recently as August 18, 16 2011, when Larson tailed Searls as Searls drove through Elma. 17 18 3.20 The relationship between Searls and Larson is documented by telephone records, 19 including text messages. 20 3.21 21 22 On August 4, 2011, Searls was being followed through the City of Elma by a City of Elma Police Department Vehicle driven by Lieutenant Richard Fletcher. Upon information and belief, Fletcher recognized the plaintiff due to the plaintiff’s operation of Free World Enterprises. 23 24 3.22 25 placed Searls under arrest. Searls was charged with Disorderly Conduct in Elma Municipal 26 Court, Cause No. 1Z0566444. Upon information and belief, Fletcher targeted Searls for 27 harassment due to Searls’ previous involvement with Free World Enterprises. 28 COMPLAINT- 5 Searls stopped his vehicle and asked Fletcher why he was being followed. Fletcher then THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 (425)457-3314(c) (425)988-1841(f) 1 3.23 Fletcher handcuffed Searls and placed him in the back seat of the police car. For 2 approximately one hour, while Fletcher “investigated” the case, Searls was locked in the hot 3 patrol car. The temperature outside was approximately 80 degrees; the temperature inside 4 substantially hotter. The windows were closed and the air conditioning was off. Searls, who is 5 asthmatic, suffered a severe asthma attack but had no access to his inhaler. As the temperature 6 inside the car rose, Searls began to sweat profusely. By the time Fletcher returned to the police 7 car, Searls was soaked with perspiration from head to toe and fearful for his life. Searls was also 8 in excruciating pain due to a recent medical procedure. 9 3.24 When Searls complained to Fletcher about the dangerous heat in the car, Fletcher 10 responded by laughing at him. 11 3.25 12 non-enforcement of state drug laws, Larson was acting under color of state authority. 13 3.26 14 Fletcher was acting under color of state authority. When Larson extracted sex from Searls in exchange for non-enforcement or purported When Fletcher maliciously exposed Searls to dangerous conditions in a locked car, 15 IV. 16 17 18 19 CAUSES OF ACTION FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION—SEXUAL EXTORTION COMMITTED UNDER COLOR OF STATE AUTHORITY IN VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY, CITY OF OAKVILLE, STEVE LARSON) 4.1 Steve Larson extorted sex from the Searls by demanding a quid pro quo arrangement 20 whereby Searls would provide sex in exchange for favorable treatment by the Grays Harbor 21 22 County Sheriff’s Office. 23 4.2 24 2011. All sex acts thereafter were nonconsensual, as Larson forced himself on Searls under 25 Searls did not want to have sex with Larson beyond their initial meeting on January 18, circumstances amounting to extortion. 26 27 28 COMPLAINT- 6 THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 (425)457-3314(c) (425)988-1841(f) 1 4.3 When Larson demanded sex while on duty, Searls was “seized” for purposes of the 2 Fourth Amendment. 3 4.4 Larson committed these acts under color of state authority. 4.5 Under the doctrine of respondent superior, Grays Harbor County and/or the City of 4 5 Oakville are liable for the torts committed by Larson while acting under color of authority. 6 7 4.6 8 Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Searls’ rights to be free from 9 unreasonable searches and seizures were violated, as were his due process rights. 10 4.7 By extorting sex from Searls, Larson violated Searls rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Larson, Grays Harbor County, and the City of Oakville are liable for damages under 42 11 12 13 14 15 U.S.C. § 1983. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION—ABUSE OF A DETAINED PERSON IN VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (CITY OF ELMA, RICHARD FLETCHER) 4.8 Lieutenant Fletcher intentionally and maliciously placed Searls in a life threatening 16 situation. 17 18 4.9 By locking Searls in a hot car, Fletcher violated Searls’ right to be free from unreasonable 19 searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 20 4.10 Larson committed these torts under color of authority. 4.11 The City of Elma is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the torts 21 22 committed by Fletcher. 23 24 4.12 Fletcher and the City of Elma are liable for damages under 42 U.S.C. 1983. V. 25 26 PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, Marcus Searls prays for the following relief: 27 28 COMPLAINT- 7 THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 (425)457-3314(c) (425)988-1841(f) 1 1. That judgment be entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against Defendants Grays Harbor 2 County and the City of Oakville, both of them liable for the torts of Defendant Steve 3 Larson, in an amount to be proven and trial, but not less than $15,000,000, or 4 $1,000,000.00 for each nonconsensual sex act extracted from the Plaintiff; 5 2. That judgment be entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against Defendant City of Elma, 6 7 liable for the torts of Richard Fletcher, in an amount to be proven at trial, but not less than 8 $1,000,000.00. 9 10 3. That he be awarded his reasonable attorneys’ fees as allowed by statute; and 4. That the Court grant him such other relief as this Court deems fair. 11 JURY DEMAND 12 13 Plaintiff Marcus Searls hereby demands a trial by jury on claims made in this Complaint. 14 DATED this the 28th day of August, 2011. 15 THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 16 17 By ____/s Lee H. Rousso____ Lee H. Rousso, WSBA #33340 The Law Office of Lee H. Rousso 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 206-623-3818 lee@leerousso.com Attorney for Marcus Searls 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT- 8 THE LAW OFFICE OF LEE H. ROUSSO 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4100 Seattle, Washington 98104 (425)457-3314(c) (425)988-1841(f)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?