Lane v. Colvin
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re stipulated motion 15 for remand. Noting Date 4/18/2017. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (Attachments: # 1 R&R Proposed Order, # 2 R&R Judgment)(GB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
7
8
9
JEFFERY LANE,
Plaintiff,
10
11
CASE NO. C16-5997-JLR-MAT
v.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
12
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
13
Defendant.
14
15
Plaintiff brought this action to seek judicial review of the denial of an application for
16
disability benefits by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The parties now
17
stipulate this case should be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. (Dkt. 15.)
18
Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court recommends this case be REVERSED
19
and REMANDED for a de novo hearing and further administrative proceedings pursuant to
20
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the Appeals Counsel shall affirm the finding that
21
the claimant became disabled beginning on December 27, 2013 and shall limit the period at issue
22
to before December 27, 2013. The Appeals Council shall further instruct the Administrative Law
23
Judge to give the claimant an opportunity for a hearing; further evaluate the claimant’s residual
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAGE - 1
1
functional capacity; and obtain supplemental vocational expert evidence that complies with Social
2
Security Ruling 00-4p.
3
The Court recommends that United States District Judge James L. Robart immediately
4
approve this Report and Recommendation and order the case REVERSED and REMANDED for
5
further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A proposed
6
order accompanies this Report and Recommendation.
7
DATED this 18th day of April, 2017.
8
A
9
Mary Alice Theiler
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAGE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?