Thiery v. Gilbert

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 9 AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. Petitioner filed a second or successive petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 without the Ninth Circuit's permission. Therefore, Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition [Dkt. #4] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Attachments: # 1 9th CCA Form 12- Application)**9 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Robert Thiery, Prisoner ID: 704828)(GMR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 8 ROBERT JOHN THIERY, JR., 9 Plaintiff, 10 11 14 15 16 17 MARGARET GILBERT, Defendants. The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER: (1) The Court adopts the Amended Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #9]. (2) Petitioner filed a second or successive petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 without the Ninth Circuit’s permission. He argues his 1994 conviction is unconstitutional after the Washington Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in State v. Williams, 336 P.3d 1152 (2014). Justice does not demand that the Court transfer his petition to the Ninth Circuit. See CTA9 Rule 22-3. (3) Therefore, Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition [Dkt. #4] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Form 12-Application for Leave to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 22.3. 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. 12 13 CASE NO. 3:16-cv-06034 RBL 23 24 ORDER - 1 1 (5) The Clerk is also directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the Hon. J. Richard Creatura. 2 DATED this 13th day of March, 2017. 3 A 4 5 Ronald B. Leighton United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?