Stogsdill v. Berryhill

Filing 13

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on the 11 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Patricia Stogsdill. Noting Date 7/5/2017, signed by Judge J Richard Creatura. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Proposed Judgment)(MET)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 PATRICIA STOGSDILL, Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05180-RSM-JRC REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 This matter has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge J. Richard Creatura pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Magistrate Judge Rule MJR 4(a)(4), and as authorized by Mathews, Secretary of H.E.W. v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 271-72 (1976). Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 11) and defendant has filed no objection. See Dkt. The Complaint was filed and the Summons were issued on March 14, 2017. Dkts. 3, 4. Defendant filed the Answer/Administrative Record on May 15, 2017. Dkt. 9. Plaintiff filed her Motion to Dismiss on June 13, 2017. Dkt. 11. The Declaration of Lindsey Craven in Support of REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS - 1 1 Motion to Dismiss verifies that plaintiff Patricia Stogsdill was advised of, and is in agreement 2 with, dismissing this claim. 3 Based on plaintiff’s motion and the declaration of counsel, and without objection from 4 defendant, this Court recommends that the District Judge immediately approve this Report and 5 Recommendation and order the case be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 41(a)(2). 7 8 Dated this 5th day of July, 2017. A 9 10 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?