Vess v. State of Washington
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by E-mail upon Respondent and Attorney General's Office; signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. (Attachments: # 1 pro se instruction form)**4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jack Vess, Prisoner ID: 327264)(CMG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
JACK DANIEL VESS II,
Petitioner,
11
13
ORDER FOR SERVICE AND
ANSWER, § 2254 PETITION
v.
12
CASE NO. 3:17-cv-05700-RBL-JRC
DONALD HOLBROOK,
Respondent.
14
15
16
This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is currently
17
incarcerated at the Washington State Penitentiary and is subject to the Court’s Electronic E-
18
Filing Program pursuant to General Orders 02-15 and 06-16. The Court, having reviewed
19
petitioner’s federal habeas petition, hereby finds and ORDERS as follows:
20
(1)
The Clerk shall arrange for service by email upon respondent and upon the
21
Attorney General of the State of Washington: copies of the petition, all documents in support
22
thereof, and this Order. The Clerk shall also direct a copy of this Order and of the Court’s pro se
23
instruction sheet to petitioner.
24
ORDER FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, § 2254
PETITION - 1
1
(2)
Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent(s) shall file and serve an
2
answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States
3
District Courts. As part of such answer, respondent(s) shall state whether petitioner has
4
exhausted available state remedies and whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary.
5
Respondent(s) shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing
6
cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent(s) shall file the answer with the Clerk of
7
the Court and serve a copy of the answer on petitioner.
8
9
(3)
The answer will be treated in accordance with LCR 7. Accordingly, on the face
of the answer, respondent(s) shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after filing.
10
Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the
11
Friday designated for consideration of the matter, and respondent(s) may file and serve a reply
12
not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter.
13
(4)
14
All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents
15
electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Petitioner shall file all documents electronically.
16
All filings must indicate in the upper right hand corner the name of the magistrate judge to whom
17
the document is directed.
18
Filing by Parties, Generally
Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served
19
upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. Petitioner
20
shall indicate the date the document is submitted for e-filing as the date of service.
21
(5)
22
Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served.
23
Motions
Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a
24
ORDER FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, § 2254
PETITION - 2
1
part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption
2
(immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for
3
consideration on the Court’s motion calendar.
4
(6)
5
No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with
6
7
Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge
regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk.
Dated this 16th day of October, 2017.
A
8
9
J. Richard Creatura
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, § 2254
PETITION - 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?