Thomas v. O'Brien
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 9 AND DISMISSING 1 § 2241 PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 7/20/11. (copy pro se petitioner via certified mail)(jcs) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/20/2011: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jcs).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11CV30
WARDEN TERRY O’BRIEN,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 9)
AND DISMISSING § 2241 PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
On April 18, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge James E.
Seibert issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), that concluded
the pro se petitioner, Solothal Thomas (“Thomas”), a prisoner in
the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), had improperly filed
this action relating to the conditions of his confinement (housing
in administrative detention) under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court
notes that, even had this case been properly filed under § 2241,
administrative remedy process.
Thomas did not file objections to the R&R, and the time to do
so has expired. The Court therefore ADOPTS the R&R in its entirety,
and DISMISSES the § 2241 petition WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
It is so ORDERED.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, the Court directs the Clerk to
enter a separate judgment order and to transmit copies of it and
THOMAS v. O’BRIEN
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
petitioner via certified mail, return receipt requested.
Dated: July 20, 2011.
/s/ Irene M. Keeley
IRENE M. KEELEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?