McFarland v. Ballard

Filing 42

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Court ADOPTS the R&R Dkt. No. 40 ; DENIES the respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely Dkt. No. 14 ; DENIES the respondents motion for summary judgment Dk t. No. 23 ; DENIES the respondents motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust Dkt. No. 31 ; GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the petitioners motion to proceed with Martinez claims or to stay the proceeding pending exhaustion Dkt. No. 38 ; STAYS the case. Court DIRECTS the petitioner to file his unexhausted claims in state court within 30 days of receipt of this Order. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 7/29/2016. (copy Counsel of record via CM/ECF, Copy pro se petitioner via certified mail)(jmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/29/2016: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (jmm).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ROBERT MCFARLAND, Petitioner, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15CV5 (Judge Keeley) DAVID BALLARD, Warden, Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the Honorable Robert W. Trumble, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 40), dated July 8, 2016. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court is required to review de novo those portions of objection is made. the magistrate judge’s findings to which Failure to file objections to the R&R permits the Court to review the recommendation under the standards that it believes are appropriate, and under these parties’ right to de novo review is waived. 468 F. Supp. 825 (E.D. Cal. 1979). been filed. circumstances, the See Webb v. Califano, To date, no objections have Accordingly, the review is for clear error. Id. Upon review of the R&R and the record, the Court adopts the opinion of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons discussed in the R&R. Therefore, the Court: 1. ADOPTS the R&R (Dkt. No. 40); MCFARLAND V. BALLARD 1:15CV5 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 2. DENIES the respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as untimely (Dkt. No. 14); 3. DENIES the respondent’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 23); 4. DENIES the respondent’s motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust (Dkt. No. 31); 5. GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the petitioner’s motion to proceed with Martinez claims or to stay the proceeding pending exhaustion (Dkt. No. 38); 6. STAYS the case; and 7. DIRECTS the petitioner to file his unexhausted claims in state court within 30 days of receipt of this Order; to file quarterly reports, beginning on October 1, 2016, explaining the status of his unexhausted claims; and to file a notice of exhaustion within 30 days from the date his state court remedies have been fully exhausted. It is so ORDERED. 2 MCFARLAND V. BALLARD 1:15CV5 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to transmit this Order to counsel of record and to the pro se petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested. DATED: July 29, 2016. /s/ Irene M. Keeley IRENE M. KEELEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?