Walker, Lamont v. Armson, Ryan et al
Filing
129
ORDER distributing voir dire questions, jury instructions and verdict form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 8/16/11. (Attachments: # 1 Voir Dire Questions, # 2 Introductory Jury Instructions, # 3 Post-Trial Jury Instructions, # 4 Special Verdict) (elc),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
LAMONT D. WALKER,
Plaintiff,
SPECIAL VERDICT
v.
10-cv-313-slc
RYAN ARMSON and JAMES KOTTKA,
Defendants.
We, the jury, for our special verdict, do find as follows:
Question No. 1: Did plaintiff Lamont Walker have a serious medical need as a result of
his asthma symptoms on July 7, 2009?
Answer: _________________________
(Yes or No)
If your answer to Question No. 1 was “yes,” then answer Question
No. 2.
If your answer to Question No. 1 was “no,” then do not answer
any more questions and proceed to the end of this verdict form.
Question No. 2: Were either of the following defendants aware that plaintiff Walker had
a serious medical need on July 7, 2009: (Answer yes or no for each defendant listed.)
Defendant Armson? _________________________
(Yes or No)
Defendant Kottka? ____________________________
(Yes or No)
If your answer to Question No. 2 was “yes” as to a defendant, then
answer Question No. 3 as to that defendant.
If your answer to Question No. 2 was “no” as to both defendants,
then do not answer any more questions and proceed to the end of
this verdict form.
Question No. 3: Did either of the following defendants consciously disregard plaintiff
Walker’s serious medical need by failing to take reasonable measures to retrieve Walker’s
inhaler?
Defendant Armson? _________________________
(Yes or No)
Defendant Kottka? ____________________________
(Yes or No)
If your answer to Question No. 3 was “yes” as to a defendant, then
answer Question No. 4 and also answer Question No. 5 as to that
defendant.
If your answer to Question No. 3 was “no,” as to both defendants,
then do not answer any more questions and proceed to the end of
this verdict form.
Question No. 4: What amount of money, if any, will fully and fairly compensate plaintiff
for the harm caused by the specified defendant?
Defendant Armson: $
Defendant Kottka: $
2
Question No. 5: Did either defendant’s conduct demonstrate a willful or reckless
disregard for the law?
Defendant Armson:
(Yes or No)
Defendant Kottka:
(Yes or No)
If your answer to Question No. 5 was “yes” as to a defendant, then
answer Question No. 6 as to that defendant.
If your answer to Question No. 5 was “no” as to both defendants,
then do not answer Question No. 6 but proceed to the end of the
verdict form.
Question No. 6: What amount of money, if any, do you award as punitive damages?
Defendant Armson: $ _________________________
Defendant Kottka: $ __________________________
__________________________________
Presiding Juror
Madison, Wisconsin
Date: ____________________
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?