Swanson, Michael v. Holinka, C.

Filing 69

Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Appeal Information Sheet, Docket Sheet and Judgment to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re 65 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Information sheet, # 2 Order, # 3 Judgment, # 4 Order, # 5 Docket sheet) (jef),(ps)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
MICHAEL SWANSON,
ORDER
Petitioner,
v.

10-cv-556-wmc

ROBERT WERLINGER, Warden,
Federal Correctional Institution -- Oxford,
Respondent.
Michael Swanson filed a petition for a federal writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the enhanced sentence he received under the career-offender
guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4Bl.l, in United States v. Swanson, OO-cr-30018 (C.D. Ill. May 13,
2002).

On January 17, 2014, this court dismissed that petition for lack of jurisdiction,

finding in the alternative that Swanson failed to demonstrate that his sentence was
improperly enhanced.
Swanson has now filed a motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). To
prevail on a motion under Rule 59(e), the moving party must identify an error of law that
merits reconsideration of the judgment. See Obriecht v. Raemisch , 517 F.3d 489, 494 (7th Cir.
2008); Sigsworth v. Ci9' of Aurora, Ill. , 487 F.3d 506, 511-12 (7th Cir. 2007). Swanson does
not show that the dismissal order was entered in error or that he is entitled to relief from the
judgment. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Swanson's motion for reconsideration (dkt. #63) is DENIED.
Entered this 31st day of January, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

/sf
WILLIAM M . CONLEY
District Judge